Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Abercrombie Classification

Read a random definition: battered child

A quick definition of Abercrombie Classification:

The Abercrombie Classification is a system that helps determine how much protection a trademark should have. There are four categories: generic, descriptive, suggestive, and arbitrary/fanciful. Generic terms, like "cell phone," can't be protected. Descriptive terms, like "fast acting," usually can't be protected unless they have a special meaning. Suggestive terms, like "Orange Crush" soda, can be protected even without a special meaning. Arbitrary/fanciful terms, like "Apple" for a computer company, have the most protection. The higher the category, the easier it is to prove trademark infringement.

A more thorough explanation:

The Abercrombie Classification is a system used in intellectual property law to determine the level of trademark protection a given term is entitled to. The system categorizes potential trademarks into four tiers, each with ascending levels of protection under the Lanham Act.

Generic terms refer to the category of a given product. For example, "cell phone" is a generic term. Generic terms are never afforded any trademark protection.

Descriptive terms explain how a given product works. For example, "fast-acting" would be a descriptive term. Descriptive terms are generally not afforded any trademark protection, but if it can be shown that a descriptive term has acquired some secondary meaning that is associable with a given party, it may still be applicable for trademark protection.

Suggestive terms bridge the gap between purely descriptive and purely arbitrary/fanciful. These terms require thought and imagination to deduce the intended conclusion about the underlying good. "Orange Crush" soda is the archetypical example of a suggestive term. Suggestive terms are entitled to trademark protection even without a secondary meaning.

Arbitrary terms are standard words used in unconventional contexts such that no one could mistake the product for its generic equivalent. For example, "Apple" is an arbitrary term to describe a computer hardware/software company. Fanciful terms are terms invented by the trademark seeker for the express purpose of naming a given product. Arbitrary/fanciful terms are entitled to the highest degree of trademark protection.

As you ascend the Abercrombie classification scheme, it becomes easier to prove trademark infringement as you need less evidence to make your case.

  • Generic: "Computer"
  • Descriptive: "Fast food"
  • Suggestive: "Netflix"
  • Arbitrary/Fanciful: "Kodak"

The examples illustrate the different levels of trademark protection. "Computer" is a generic term and therefore not entitled to any trademark protection. "Fast food" is a descriptive term and would not be entitled to trademark protection unless it can be shown to have acquired a secondary meaning. "Netflix" is a suggestive term and is entitled to trademark protection even without a secondary meaning. "Kodak" is an arbitrary/fanciful term and is entitled to the highest degree of trademark protection.

abduction | abet

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
MIAMI A
[] AromaticTroubledDormouse
20:55
How does one know if they are UR1 or UR2?
[] AromaticTroubledDormouse
20:56
CONGRATS MACAQUE!
TY
got a random stanford email and almost had a heart attack
ALSO CONGRATS!
Congrats1!
21:15
Miami A, yall I'm so excited I could cry.
21:15
Feel like I can finally stop holding my breath!! Whew!!!
[] baddestbunny
22:16
every time I get accosted by a strange man who follows me around because my male coworkers were too busy talking to walk me back to my car I get closer to saying we need to bring back traditional gender roles
Dkk
22:32
Nice! @Macaque
Dkk
22:32
@Aromatic, Have to guess.
Dkk
22:33
That sucks @Bunny do you have to go to the hospital?
[] baddestbunny
22:40
I said accosted not assaulted
23:35
guys. my notre dame address just went long is this good or bad
1a2b3c4d26z
23:37
Oooooo me too
23:37
omg is this good or bad
Dkk
23:47
Idk if gender roles are gunna fix that then.
23:49
it looks like most people who applied in october last cycle didn't get a decision until january... does it even mean anything that our addresses went long??
hows ED 2 compared to ED 1?
Dkk
0:10
No idea
windyMagician
0:34
reporting live to say my ndls address also went long
does it mean anything ^
Dkk
2:21
NDLS and Fordham took a very long time last year. It's good info for people to know.
[] baddestbunny
4:29
let’s get after it boys and girls
Dkk
5:21
I gtg to bed soon.
Dkk
5:22
Big day today. Gunna be a crazy one. I will sleep through the first half.
good morning lsd it is 5 am EST
also jazzy my ndls address went long ages ago i sadly do not think it means anything
my stanford address also went long LOL i think at most it's an indicator it's under review
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.