Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

actual-risk test

Read a random definition: bonitary

A quick definition of actual-risk test:

The actual-risk test is a rule that says if an employee gets hurt while working, they can only get workers' compensation benefits if they can prove that the injury happened because of their job. This means that the injury must have happened while the employee was doing something related to their work, and not because of something else.

A more thorough explanation:

The actual-risk test is a legal principle that determines whether an employee is entitled to receive workers' compensation benefits. According to this doctrine, an injured employee must prove that the injury occurred while performing work-related duties and was caused by the employment.

For example, if a construction worker falls from a scaffold while working on a building, the injury is considered work-related and is covered by workers' compensation. However, if the same worker falls from a scaffold while on a break and not performing work-related duties, the injury may not be covered.

The actual-risk test is used to determine whether an injury is work-related and whether the employee is entitled to receive compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages resulting from the injury.

actual reduction to practice | actual seisin

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.