Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

actual reduction to practice

Read a random definition: digital cash

A quick definition of actual reduction to practice:

Actual Reduction to Practice: This is when an invention is physically made or a patent application is filed with enough information to teach someone how to make and use the invention without too much difficulty. It is important because it determines who gets the patent for the invention. It shows that the invention works as intended and is complete for patent purposes. There are also other types of reduction to practice, such as constructive and vicarious, but actual reduction to practice is the most important.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Actual reduction to practice is the demonstration that an invention works as intended and is complete for patent purposes. This can be achieved through physical construction and operation or by filing a patent application that provides enough detail for a person skilled in the art to make and test the invention without undue experimentation.

Example: If an inventor creates a new machine and tests it to ensure that it works as intended, this is an actual reduction to practice. Alternatively, if the inventor files a patent application that includes detailed instructions on how to make and test the machine, this is a constructive reduction to practice.

Explanation: Actual reduction to practice is important in determining priority between inventors competing for a patent on the same invention. It is necessary to demonstrate that the invention works as intended and is complete for patent purposes. This can be achieved through physical testing or by filing a detailed patent application. The examples illustrate the two ways in which actual reduction to practice can be achieved.

actual possession | actual-risk test

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
get on that trump coin before the rug pull lol
Dkk
17:09
@BigStrongBug: I don't consider myself a one issue voter but if I had to pick one it would be gender relations.
i am a one issue voter for the economy, which is why i voted harris
texaslawhopefully
17:10
Here's a fairly well respected estimate fruitybat: The proposed tariffs could cost consumers an additional $2,500 to $7,600 a year per household, according to estimates, said Jonathan Gold, vice president of supply chain and customs policy for the National Retail Federation.
i am a voter so i voted
17:11
Lol what does gender relations mean
17:11
Like are you anti gay marriage?
texaslawhopefully
17:11
@Dkk: So you care about gender relations over the Constitution, institutional stability, the economy, political norms, etc.?
blue collar trump voters are gonna blame anything but him anyway when the price of their household consumption goes through the roof. I wonder how they'll spin that narrative.
17:11
Or are you an all inclusive hater and include trans folks too
texaslawhopefully
17:12
Even if you have conservative social values you still shouldn't like Trump lol, but that's a whole diff convo
I love when people prefer putting not talking about gender in schools at the top of the agenda instead of dealing with school shootings
this is going to blow your mind but once you realize women and men are more similar than different you will drown in pussy or dick
17:12
@HopefullyInLawSchool: $45k @ KS is really good. $145k is to attend it is not a bad deal
facts knowledgeable
Also love how he put an EO to leave the Paris climate agreement in the midst of the LA wildfires and places who haven’t gotten snow in 15 years now getting storms
@llama: it would only be 17,000 ish per year
17:15
yeah and i think after 1L u get in state? not certain
I dont think so based on my very brief research
17:16
hmm I know some school offer that in their offer (I also believe KS does not negotiate) but I wonder which schools would reconsider with a condition of in state after 1L yr?
Dkk
17:17
@texaslawhopefully: Not necessarily but I believe what Aristotle used to say. He used to say you could not have a functioning political system if you can not get gender relations right. Or essentially that.
KS does negotiate! I got an email saying theyre doing it for the first time this year
its rather limited but its not nothing
17:18
@HopefullyInLawSchool: noted, thanks for the intel. I know we joke around but all things conidered, KS is goated
Dkk
17:18
@BigStrongBug: Nah aristotle only applies gender as a role which I think either sex could fulfill. My issue with Trump's EO to limit things to only sex but I am fine with him doing it for now.
Yeah and Aristotle old as hell boy he would’ve died of hysteria after learning what the internet and tiktok is
Dkk
17:19
@SplitterusClitterus: I think some school shootings could have been prevented if gender relations were better.
Very few of any,, none come to my mind tbh
17:19
@llama: hi
They all seem like mental health and access to gun issues
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.