Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

adoption agency

Read a random definition: ADA

A quick definition of adoption agency:

An adoption agency is a place where a parent can give their child up for adoption. This means that the child will be legally taken care of by another family who will become their new parents. Adoption is when a judge decides that the child can become a part of a new family. This is only done when the child has no parents or their parents have given up their rights. Adoption gives the child new parents who will take care of them and love them like their own child.

A more thorough explanation:

An adoption agency is a licensed establishment where a biological parent can voluntarily surrender a child for adoption. This means that if a parent is unable or unwilling to care for their child, they can give up their parental rights and allow another family to adopt and raise the child as their own.

For example, if a teenage mother is unable to provide for her newborn baby, she may choose to give the baby up for adoption through an adoption agency. The agency will then work to find a suitable family to adopt the baby and provide them with a loving home.

Adoption creates a parent-child relationship between the adopted child and the adoptive parents with all the rights, privileges, and responsibilities that attach to that relationship. This means that the adoptive parents have the same legal rights and responsibilities as biological parents, such as making decisions about the child's education and healthcare.

It's important to note that adoption is different from fostering, which is a temporary arrangement where a child is placed in the care of a foster family while their biological parents work to improve their situation.

adoptee | Adoption and Safe Families Act

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.