Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

agricultural lien

Read a random definition: green-card marriage

A quick definition of agricultural lien:

An agricultural lien is a special kind of loan that farmers can get to help them grow crops or raise animals. When a farmer takes out this loan, they have to put something valuable, like their farm equipment or livestock, up as collateral. This means that if the farmer can't pay back the loan, the lender can take possession of the collateral. Every state has a law that automatically creates an agricultural lien when a farmer takes out this kind of loan. These loans are really important for farmers because they help them keep their farms running and produce food for everyone.

A more thorough explanation:

An agricultural lien is a type of lien that is placed on farm products such as livestock or farm equipment. This lien is used to secure payment or performance in exchange for a loan of land, goods, or money. These loans are important for farmers as they allow them to produce the next season of crops or raise the next season of livestock.

If a farmer is unable to repay the loan, the creditor can take possession of the farmer's farm products. This is possible due to the agricultural lien that was placed on the property when the loan was taken out.

For example, if a farmer takes out a loan to purchase new equipment for their farm, the creditor may place an agricultural lien on the equipment. If the farmer is unable to repay the loan, the creditor can take possession of the equipment to recoup their losses.

It is important to note that every state has its own statute regarding agricultural liens. These statutes automatically create an agricultural lien on the property of the farmer when they take out a loan under the circumstances provided by that individual statute.

agreement | agriculture

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.