Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

all-steps rule

Read a random definition: delator

A quick definition of all-steps rule:

All-Steps Rule: In patents, this rule means that for a method or process to be considered as infringing on a claim, it must have every step and limitation of the claim or an equivalent. This means that if even one step is missing or not equivalent, the accused process cannot be considered as infringing on the claim. This rule is also known as the "all-or-nothing" rule.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: The all-steps rule is a doctrine in patent law that states for a method or process claim to be considered infringed by an accused process, the accused process must have every step and limitation of the infringed claim or an equivalent. This means that if even one step is missing or not equivalent, there is no infringement.

Example: Let's say a company has a patent for a method of making a cake that involves mixing flour, sugar, eggs, and milk, and then baking it in an oven at 350 degrees for 30 minutes. Another company creates a similar cake but only bakes it for 20 minutes. This would not be considered infringement because the accused process does not have every step and limitation of the infringed claim.

Explanation: The all-steps rule is important in patent law because it ensures that patent holders have exclusive rights to their inventions. It also provides clarity for companies and individuals who may be accused of infringement, as they can determine whether their process meets all the requirements of the patent claim. In the example above, the accused process did not meet all the requirements of the patent claim, so it would not be considered infringement.

all-risk insurance | all substantial rights

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
I'm very happy for everyone admitted to the U *intense sobbing*
oh yeah I meant 2/14, the first ACL
19:22
i got 5 automated rejection emails for the same job
19:22
every hour
jesus
19:23
idk what they doin over dere
me when yet another week of schools sending out mass decisions but missing me (I know I'm a late applicant let me cope)
19:24
same i am still ur at nyu
it feels like surviving an execution
19:24
do they send all the updates for them at once at the beginning of the day, or are they actually rolling out decisions
19:24
i cant tell if ppl r just tracking late or actually getting them rolling
we r all lined up, blindfolded, and then the schools shoot people around and near you, and occasionally people out of the line. and u just stand there and wait for ur bullet or ur shoulder tap
19:25
ahhh got it
I think if it's R/WL, more likely big wave hit inboxes and people trickling in to update here last.
A's can be rolling tho
19:25
ok yeah then i dont really need to be refreshing every hour
The UofU has been calling people with admits which is more time consuming than just mass sending that god forsaken email (when will it be my turn)
It’s almost May and that’s making me worried
Its over this cycle
:(
20:28
WL is not R it aint over till its over
20:28
Liar ass mafucka
20:28
Waitlist is R
20:28
um
20:28
ok
20:30
@c0bra1: damn right! - GI Joe
21:14
Don't loose hope frens. It aint over, till its over, brother. -Hoya Saxa
Hey if I am on a bunch of waitlists am I screwed ?
21:39
@AlejandroAI405: Not for certain. You can get off the wait list, however it can be difficult. Would you consider reapplying next year or/and retaking the LSAT? You may drastically increase your choices/outcome(s)/and possibly get a scholarship
stay strong soldiers
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.