Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

all-steps rule

Read a random definition: Sealing of records

A quick definition of all-steps rule:

All-Steps Rule: In patents, this rule means that for a method or process to be considered as infringing on a claim, it must have every step and limitation of the claim or an equivalent. This means that if even one step is missing or not equivalent, the accused process cannot be considered as infringing on the claim. This rule is also known as the "all-or-nothing" rule.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: The all-steps rule is a doctrine in patent law that states for a method or process claim to be considered infringed by an accused process, the accused process must have every step and limitation of the infringed claim or an equivalent. This means that if even one step is missing or not equivalent, there is no infringement.

Example: Let's say a company has a patent for a method of making a cake that involves mixing flour, sugar, eggs, and milk, and then baking it in an oven at 350 degrees for 30 minutes. Another company creates a similar cake but only bakes it for 20 minutes. This would not be considered infringement because the accused process does not have every step and limitation of the infringed claim.

Explanation: The all-steps rule is important in patent law because it ensures that patent holders have exclusive rights to their inventions. It also provides clarity for companies and individuals who may be accused of infringement, as they can determine whether their process meets all the requirements of the patent claim. In the example above, the accused process did not meet all the requirements of the patent claim, so it would not be considered infringement.

all-risk insurance | all substantial rights

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.