Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

ancient document rule

Read a random definition: inside information

A quick definition of ancient document rule:

The ancient document rule is a way to prove that a document is real and can be used as evidence in court. If a document is more than 20 years old, looks normal, and is found in a place where it should be, then it is considered real and can be used in court. This rule also applies to old documents that have information that someone said but are not in court to say it themselves. However, the document must be proven to be real and made before 1998 to be used in court.

A more thorough explanation:

The ancient document rule is a way to prove the authenticity of evidence in court. According to this rule, if a document is:

  1. More than 20 years old
  2. Looks normal and hasn't been changed
  3. Found in a place where it would be expected to be found

Then the document is considered to be authentic and can be used as evidence in court.

For example, let's say a lawyer wants to use a letter that was written by someone who has since passed away. If the letter is more than 20 years old, looks normal, and was found in a place where it would be expected to be found (like in the person's old desk), then it can be used as evidence in court.

The ancient document rule can also be used as a hearsay exception under Federal Rule of Evidence 803 (16). This means that if a document is more than 20 years old and was created before 1998, it can be used as evidence even if it contains hearsay (secondhand information).

For example, let's say a lawyer wants to use a diary entry from someone who has since passed away. If the diary entry is more than 20 years old, was created before 1998, and was found in a place where it would be expected to be found (like in the person's old bedroom), then it can be used as evidence in court even if it contains hearsay.

Overall, the ancient document rule is a way to prove the authenticity of old documents in court, making them admissible as evidence.

anchoring | ancillary administration

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.