Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

ancient document rule

Read a random definition: scale

A quick definition of ancient document rule:

The ancient document rule is a way to prove that a document is real and can be used as evidence in court. If a document is more than 20 years old, looks normal, and is found in a place where it should be, then it is considered real and can be used in court. This rule also applies to old documents that have information that someone said but are not in court to say it themselves. However, the document must be proven to be real and made before 1998 to be used in court.

A more thorough explanation:

The ancient document rule is a way to prove the authenticity of evidence in court. According to this rule, if a document is:

  1. More than 20 years old
  2. Looks normal and hasn't been changed
  3. Found in a place where it would be expected to be found

Then the document is considered to be authentic and can be used as evidence in court.

For example, let's say a lawyer wants to use a letter that was written by someone who has since passed away. If the letter is more than 20 years old, looks normal, and was found in a place where it would be expected to be found (like in the person's old desk), then it can be used as evidence in court.

The ancient document rule can also be used as a hearsay exception under Federal Rule of Evidence 803 (16). This means that if a document is more than 20 years old and was created before 1998, it can be used as evidence even if it contains hearsay (secondhand information).

For example, let's say a lawyer wants to use a diary entry from someone who has since passed away. If the diary entry is more than 20 years old, was created before 1998, and was found in a place where it would be expected to be found (like in the person's old bedroom), then it can be used as evidence in court even if it contains hearsay.

Overall, the ancient document rule is a way to prove the authenticity of old documents in court, making them admissible as evidence.

anchoring | ancillary administration

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
@jackfrost11770: FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUu
jackfrost11770
17:08
FUCK THE NYPD
WASP HAHAHAHAHHA
texaslawhopefully
17:08
Estimates are about 4k fruitbat
YRDSL
17:08
im a 1 issue voter - if i want someone to be elected i vote for them
woof
texaslawhopefully
17:08
I've seen some that could be as high as 7k though
17:08
@jackfrost11770: ya prolly don't buy any lotto tickets tonite
get on that trump coin before the rug pull lol
Dkk
17:09
@BigStrongBug: I don't consider myself a one issue voter but if I had to pick one it would be gender relations.
i am a one issue voter for the economy, which is why i voted harris
texaslawhopefully
17:10
Here's a fairly well respected estimate fruitybat: The proposed tariffs could cost consumers an additional $2,500 to $7,600 a year per household, according to estimates, said Jonathan Gold, vice president of supply chain and customs policy for the National Retail Federation.
i am a voter so i voted
17:11
Lol what does gender relations mean
17:11
Like are you anti gay marriage?
texaslawhopefully
17:11
@Dkk: So you care about gender relations over the Constitution, institutional stability, the economy, political norms, etc.?
blue collar trump voters are gonna blame anything but him anyway when the price of their household consumption goes through the roof. I wonder how they'll spin that narrative.
17:11
Or are you an all inclusive hater and include trans folks too
texaslawhopefully
17:12
Even if you have conservative social values you still shouldn't like Trump lol, but that's a whole diff convo
I love when people prefer putting not talking about gender in schools at the top of the agenda instead of dealing with school shootings
this is going to blow your mind but once you realize women and men are more similar than different you will drown in pussy or dick
17:12
@HopefullyInLawSchool: $45k @ KS is really good. $145k is to attend it is not a bad deal
facts knowledgeable
Also love how he put an EO to leave the Paris climate agreement in the midst of the LA wildfires and places who haven’t gotten snow in 15 years now getting storms
@llama: it would only be 17,000 ish per year
17:15
yeah and i think after 1L u get in state? not certain
I dont think so based on my very brief research
17:16
hmm I know some school offer that in their offer (I also believe KS does not negotiate) but I wonder which schools would reconsider with a condition of in state after 1L yr?
Dkk
17:17
@texaslawhopefully: Not necessarily but I believe what Aristotle used to say. He used to say you could not have a functioning political system if you can not get gender relations right. Or essentially that.
KS does negotiate! I got an email saying theyre doing it for the first time this year
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.