Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

antihazing statute

Read a random definition: reissuable error

A quick definition of antihazing statute:

An antihazing statute is a law that makes it illegal for any group or its members to force someone who wants to join to do anything that could hurt them physically or mentally. This law was first made in 1874 to stop hazing by midshipmen at the United States Naval Academy. Almost all states have their own antihazing laws to protect people from being hurt while trying to join a group.

A more thorough explanation:

An antihazing statute is a law that prohibits any organization or its members from requiring a prospective member to do or submit to any act that presents a substantial risk of physical or mental harm as a condition of membership. This law is usually criminal in nature and is aimed at preventing hazing.

For example, in 1874, Congress passed the first antihazing statute to stop hazing by midshipmen at the United States Naval Academy. Since then, most states have passed their own antihazing statutes to protect individuals from being subjected to harmful hazing practices.

Another example of an antihazing statute is the Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law, which was passed in Pennsylvania in 2018. This law was named after a Penn State student who died as a result of hazing. The law imposes stricter penalties on individuals and organizations that engage in hazing practices.

These examples illustrate how antihazing statutes are put in place to protect individuals from being subjected to harmful hazing practices. They also show that the consequences of violating these laws can be severe, including criminal charges and penalties.

antigraphus | anti-heartbalm statute

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.