Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

antimarital-facts privilege

Read a random definition: forum conveniens

A quick definition of antimarital-facts privilege:

Antimarital-facts privilege is a legal right that allows spouses to keep confidential communications between them during their marriage. This means that they cannot be forced to testify or disclose information about these communications in court, even if it is relevant to the case. It is also known as the privilege against adverse spousal testimony. This privilege is different from the marital-communications privilege, which protects confidential communications between spouses, and the privilege against self-incrimination, which is a criminal defendant's right not to be questioned by the judge or prosecution unless they choose to testify.

A more thorough explanation:

Antimarital-facts privilege is a type of privilege that allows a spouse not to testify against their partner in a criminal case, regardless of the subject matter of the testimony. This privilege protects confidential communications made between spouses during the marriage.

For example, if a husband and wife are accused of a crime, the wife cannot be forced to testify against her husband about any confidential communication they had during their marriage. This privilege is also known as the privilege against adverse spousal testimony.

The purpose of this privilege is to protect the sanctity of marriage and encourage open communication between spouses. It is important to note that this privilege only applies to criminal cases and not civil cases.

antimanifesto | antinomia

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.