Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

arbiter

Read a random definition: assignee clause

A quick definition of arbiter:

An arbiter is a person who has the power to make decisions when people disagree. They use rules and fairness to make their decisions. They are different from arbitrators because arbitrators can make decisions based on their own opinions, while arbiters have to follow the rules. Arbiters can work on disputes outside of arbitration, and they are chosen by the parties or the court. They have to be fair and not take sides. Sometimes, their decision is final and cannot be changed, but other times, people can still go to court if they don't agree with the decision.

A more thorough explanation:

An arbiter is a person who has the legal power to make decisions in disputes. They make their decisions based on the rules of law and fairness. An arbiter is different from an arbitrator because an arbitrator can use their own judgment to make decisions, while an arbiter must follow the law. Arbitrators can only decide disputes that arise in arbitration, while an arbiter can decide disputes outside of arbitration.

  • When two companies have a disagreement about a contract, they may hire an arbiter to make a decision.
  • In a divorce case, the couple may choose to have an arbiter decide on issues like child custody and property division.

These examples illustrate how an arbiter can be used in different types of disputes, from business contracts to personal matters like divorce. The arbiter is chosen by the parties involved and must remain impartial throughout the process. The decision made by the arbiter may be final and binding, meaning it cannot be appealed except on very narrow grounds.

APR | arbitrary

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.