Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

assault with a dangerous weapon

Read a random definition: bill of information

A quick definition of assault with a dangerous weapon:

Assault with a dangerous weapon is when someone threatens or uses force with a weapon that could cause serious harm to another person. This is a type of assault, which is when someone makes another person afraid that they will be hurt. Assault can also include trying to hurt someone, even if they don't actually get hurt. Assault with a dangerous weapon is a more serious type of assault because the weapon makes it more likely that the victim will be seriously hurt.

A more thorough explanation:

Assault with a dangerous weapon is a type of assault where someone threatens or uses force on another person with a weapon that could cause serious harm or death. It is considered a criminal offense.

For example, if someone threatens to hit another person with a knife or gun, that would be considered assault with a dangerous weapon. If someone actually hits another person with a baseball bat, that would also be considered assault with a dangerous weapon.

These examples illustrate the definition because they involve the use of a weapon that could cause serious harm or death, and the threat or use of force on another person.

assaulter | assay

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
lilypadfrog
20:31
that seems crazy #tome
texaslawhopefully
20:32
No, at least from the two people I know there that’s false. I think it’s just something like Chicago for conservatives is on par with S whereas for liberals it’s below HYS but above CCNP
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
YRDSL
21:31
@texaslawhopefully: it's pretty funny how even in law journal articles people can't stop confusing Penn with Penn State
texaslawhopefully
21:40
lmfao I didn't even notice that
21:42
Yeah to penn Carey students I’m sure that is a
21:42
Those are fighting words
21:46
@Dkk: one of the most deranged documents i've ever had the displeasure of reading
lilypadfrog
22:03
sometimes I go into fight or flight mode until I get all my work done
i call that locking in
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.