Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

binding instruction

Read a random definition: stultiloquium

A quick definition of binding instruction:

A binding instruction is a direction given by a judge to a jury about the law of a case. It tells the jury what they must do based on the evidence presented. Sometimes, the jury may ask for more information or clarification, and the judge may give additional instructions. There are different types of instructions, such as mandatory instructions that require the jury to find for one party and against the other, and cautionary instructions that tell the jury to disregard certain evidence or not be influenced by outside factors. Model jury instructions are forms of instructions that are usually accepted as authoritative.

A more thorough explanation:

A binding instruction is a direction or guideline that a judge gives to a jury concerning the law of the case. It is also known as a mandatory instruction. This means that the jury must follow the instruction and make their decision based on it.

For example, if a judge gives a binding instruction that a defendant cannot be convicted unless there is proof beyond a reasonable doubt, the jury must follow this instruction and find the defendant not guilty if they have any doubt about the evidence.

Another example of a binding instruction is when a judge instructs the jury to find for one party and against the other if a given set of facts exists. This means that the jury must make their decision based on the facts presented and follow the judge's instruction.

Overall, a binding instruction is a crucial part of a trial as it guides the jury in making their decision based on the law of the case.

binding authority | binding receipt

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
180letmein
10:31
Isn't Fordham pretty big name anywhere you go tho?
10:31
Yeah I think that’s kinda true but I think if you work super hard and are top 10%at the t≈50 you’re kinda chilling
eggan
10:31
in the tri state area absolutely. california theyve never heard of fordham
eggan
10:32
maybe not never but theyd rather take from a similarly reputable regional school in california like irvine or davis
eggan
10:32
im also doing fordham PI so its different
180letmein
10:32
Ahhh makes sense.
eggan
10:33
@winningest: top 10% isnt guaranteed tho. the curve might beat ur ass
eggan
10:34
between wayne and maurer tho for full rides id actually do maurer. indiana is a bigger name imo than wayne
eggan
10:35
you could probably get a cool job in chicago there
10:35
Between those two I lean Wayne bc I prefer location
eggan
10:35
gotcha its a location thing
TenFiftyILuvUGang
10:36
me and my friends we got money to spend
TenFiftyILuvUGang
10:36
me n my friends we got money to spend
TenFiftyILuvUGang
10:36
me n my friends me n my friends
10:37
It seems so odd that lower ranked schools tend to region lock you though, it’s the only profession that really works like that I feel
10:38
That’s part of my fear is I don’t truly know where I’ll want to live in a decade
10:38
kjkj
10:45
what's up bullet shields?
Mostlylegal
10:46
ANOTHER DAY ANOTHER FO PM?
10:48
Heard maga SLS wave this week
Mostlylegal
10:50
guys i dont think i can take this anymore
10:50
So join a gang, esse
10:51
Everything is a choice, brudda
ClassyPleasantHeron
11:36
I'm honestly surprised that NYU has bothered to send more As this late.
MrThickRopes
11:38
Where da decisions at
11:40
^
babycakes
11:40
NYU has not rendered decisions for 50+% all applicants
babycakes
11:41
of all
babycakes
11:41
They are one of the law schools with the most acceptances left to give, along with Stanford
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.