Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

binding precedent

Read a random definition: idoneum se facere; idoneare se

A quick definition of binding precedent:

Binding precedent is a legal rule made by a higher court that lower courts must follow. When a higher court decides a case, it writes down its decision in a document called an opinion. This opinion includes the court's decision on a legal issue, which is called a holding. Lower courts in the same area must follow this holding when they have a similar case. For example, the highest court in the United States is the Supreme Court, and its decisions must be followed by all other courts in the country.

A more thorough explanation:

Binding precedent is a legal rule or principle that must be followed by lower courts within its jurisdiction. When an appellate court reviews a case, it delivers a written opinion that includes its determination on some legal matter. This determination, known as a holding, is binding on all lower courts within the jurisdiction. This means that lower courts must apply this decision when presented with similar facts.

For example, the Supreme Court is the highest court in the U.S. and its decisions are binding on all other courts in the U.S. If the Supreme Court decides that a certain law is unconstitutional, all other courts in the U.S. must follow this decision and declare the law unconstitutional if presented with a similar case.

Similarly, the decisions of the highest court in New York are only binding on other New York courts, but not courts in other states. If the highest court in New York decides that a certain contract is unenforceable, all other New York courts must follow this decision and declare the contract unenforceable if presented with a similar case.

These examples illustrate how binding precedent works. Once a higher court makes a decision on a legal matter, lower courts must follow that decision when presented with similar cases. This helps ensure consistency and predictability in the legal system.

binder | BIOCOB

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.