Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA)

Read a random definition: utiliter impensum

A quick definition of Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA):

The Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA) is a group that helps veterans get benefits from the government. Veterans can apply for benefits through the Veterans Benefits Administration or the Veterans Health Administration. If they don't agree with the decision, they can appeal to the BVA. There are three ways to appeal: Direct Review, Evidence Submission, or Hearing with a Veterans Law Judge. If the BVA says no, veterans can appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. If a veteran filed an appeal before February 19th, 2019, they can choose to follow the old process or the new one.

A more thorough explanation:

The Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA) is a group that decides on appeals made by U.S. military veterans who are seeking benefits from the U.S. Department of Veterans’ Affairs (VA). These benefits can include disability compensation, medical benefits, or military pensions. The BVA is part of the VA and is authorized by U.S.C. 38 Chapter 71.

When a veteran applies for benefits, they first go to their local VA agency, such as the Veterans Benefits Administration or the Veterans Health Administration. If the veteran disagrees with the initial decision made by the local VA agency, they have one year to pursue one of three possible decision review options:

  • Filing a supplemental claim via VA form 20-0995
  • Filing for higher level review via VA form 20-0996
  • Appealing to the Board of Veteran Appeals via VA Form 10182

If a veteran decides to appeal to the BVA, they have three options regarding how the BVA will review their case:

  • Direct Review: The BVA will reconsider the evidence already submitted and look for mistakes of law/fact the local VA agency may have made. No new evidence is submitted, so Direct Review is the fastest form of appealing to the Board of Veteran Appeals.
  • Evidence Submission: A party pursuing evidence submission is allowed to provide additional evidence to support their case for benefits for up to 90 days after filing an appeal. If a party selects Evidence submission, the BVA will not reconsider evidence already provided to the local VA agency.
  • Hearing with a Veterans Law Judge: A party who selects a hearing with a law judge has the opportunity to make their case directly to the BVA rather than through written documents. Choosing a hearing allows a party to submit additional evidence. Hearings are offered in both virtual and physical formats.

If the BVA denies the veterans’ claims, then the veteran may appeal further to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims.

For example, if a veteran applies for disability compensation and is denied by their local VA agency, they can appeal to the BVA using one of the three decision review options. If they choose to have a hearing with a Veterans Law Judge, they can present their case in person and submit additional evidence to support their claim.

Board of Education v. Earls (2002) | body of laws

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.