Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Brandenburg test

Read a random definition: plena probatio

A quick definition of Brandenburg test:

The Brandenburg test is a way to determine when speech that encourages illegal actions can be restricted. It was established in a court case where a KKK leader gave a speech that included racial slurs and a suggestion of possible violence. The test says that the government can only restrict speech that is intended to incite immediate illegal action and is likely to do so. This means that people can say things that advocate for illegal actions in the future, as long as it is not likely to cause immediate harm. The test has been used in other court cases to protect free speech.

A more thorough explanation:

The Brandenburg test is a legal standard used to determine when speech that advocates illegal action can be restricted. It was established in the case of Brandenburg v. Ohio in 1969.

The test has two parts:

  1. The speech is “directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action”
  2. The speech is “likely to incite or produce such action”

If both parts of the test are met, the government may prohibit the speech.

In the case of Hess v. Indiana, a protester said, “We’ll take the fucking street later (or again)." The Supreme Court ruled that this speech was protected under the Brandenburg test because it was not intended to produce imminent disorder.

In NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co., a man threatened violence against those who refused to boycott white businesses. The Supreme Court applied the Brandenburg test and found that the speech was protected because it did not incite lawless action.

These examples illustrate how the Brandenburg test is used to determine when speech that advocates illegal action can be restricted. If the speech does not meet both parts of the test, it is protected under the First Amendment's freedom of speech.

Brady rule | breach

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.