Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Brown v. Board of Education (1954)

Read a random definition: left-handed marriage

A quick definition of Brown v. Board of Education (1954):

Brown v. Board of Education was a very important decision made by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1954. It said that it was not okay to have separate schools for black and white students, even if the schools were supposed to be equal. This decision helped to end segregation in schools and was a big win for the Civil Rights Movement. The case started when a black family in Kansas sued the school district for not letting their daughter go to the school closest to their home. The Supreme Court's decision was unanimous, but some people in the South didn't like it and tried to resist it. The Supreme Court had to remind them that they had to follow the decision and end segregation in schools.

A more thorough explanation:

Overview: Brown v. Board of Education (1954) was a famous decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that ended segregation in schools. The court ruled that laws that separated students by race in public schools were unconstitutional, even if the schools were "separate but equal" in quality. The court said that separate schools were inherently unequal and violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. However, the court did not say how to end segregation, so a later decision, Brown II (1955), ordered states to desegregate "with all deliberate speed."

Background: In 1951, a black man named Oliver Brown tried to enroll his daughter in a school near their home in Topeka, Kansas, but the school district made her go to a school farther away because she was black. Brown and other black families sued the Topeka Board of Education, arguing that the segregation policy was unconstitutional. The U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas ruled against them, citing a previous Supreme Court decision that said segregation was okay if the facilities were equal. Brown appealed to the Supreme Court.

Example: The Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. Board of Education overruled the previous decision in Plessy v. Ferguson, which had allowed segregation as long as the facilities were equal. This decision was a major victory for the Civil Rights Movement and led to more integration in other areas.

Example: Some Southern politicians tried to resist or delay desegregation, which was known as "Massive Resistance." However, in the case of Cooper v. Aaron, the Supreme Court said that officials could not ignore the Brown decision or delay desegregation.

Explanation: These examples show how the Brown decision was a turning point in the Civil Rights Movement and how some people tried to resist it. The Cooper decision showed that the Supreme Court was serious about ending segregation and that officials had to follow the law.

broker | bucket shop

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
Give it 4 more weeks at least. Everyone in this chat needs to wait longer.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.