Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Brown v. Board of Education (1954)

Read a random definition: in diem addictio

A quick definition of Brown v. Board of Education (1954):

Brown v. Board of Education was a very important decision made by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1954. It said that it was not okay to have separate schools for black and white students, even if the schools were supposed to be equal. This decision helped to end segregation in schools and was a big win for the Civil Rights Movement. The case started when a black family in Kansas sued the school district for not letting their daughter go to the school closest to their home. The Supreme Court's decision was unanimous, but some people in the South didn't like it and tried to resist it. The Supreme Court had to remind them that they had to follow the decision and end segregation in schools.

A more thorough explanation:

Overview: Brown v. Board of Education (1954) was a famous decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that ended segregation in schools. The court ruled that laws that separated students by race in public schools were unconstitutional, even if the schools were "separate but equal" in quality. The court said that separate schools were inherently unequal and violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. However, the court did not say how to end segregation, so a later decision, Brown II (1955), ordered states to desegregate "with all deliberate speed."

Background: In 1951, a black man named Oliver Brown tried to enroll his daughter in a school near their home in Topeka, Kansas, but the school district made her go to a school farther away because she was black. Brown and other black families sued the Topeka Board of Education, arguing that the segregation policy was unconstitutional. The U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas ruled against them, citing a previous Supreme Court decision that said segregation was okay if the facilities were equal. Brown appealed to the Supreme Court.

Example: The Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. Board of Education overruled the previous decision in Plessy v. Ferguson, which had allowed segregation as long as the facilities were equal. This decision was a major victory for the Civil Rights Movement and led to more integration in other areas.

Example: Some Southern politicians tried to resist or delay desegregation, which was known as "Massive Resistance." However, in the case of Cooper v. Aaron, the Supreme Court said that officials could not ignore the Brown decision or delay desegregation.

Explanation: These examples show how the Brown decision was a turning point in the Civil Rights Movement and how some people tried to resist it. The Cooper decision showed that the Supreme Court was serious about ending segregation and that officials had to follow the law.

broker | bucket shop

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
11:20
Saw a guy that wrote in Biden and he said no retirement for you buddy
1a2b3c4d26z
11:20
@ClockworkBlue: god I hope that's true
if the country was run the same as Mich Law it would be a better place
Imagine if election night was run by an adcom? Like, "yep, we could get the results Friday, or June 2025."
imagine if it was like Berkley applications
1a2b3c4d26z
11:22
Election status: Complete
1a2b3c4d26z
11:22
For months
triplethread
11:23
erection day
soapy
11:23
Shoutout to Robinhood's election bet not resolving until January
triplethread
11:23
is anyone else like certain that trump will win
ambitiouslizard
11:23
he aint winning
triplethread
11:23
i like being a pessimist
ambitiouslizard
11:24
he lost his re-election, why would he win this one?
1a2b3c4d26z
11:25
I have no idea why people have so much beef w berkeley's app
I've been reading a bit about "herding," which is this idea that pollsters are making the race look tied so they look right no matter who wins.
1a2b3c4d26z
11:26
Like... it's a more involved app but you don't have to do it? They're clearly trying to have some self-selection go on
I 100% agree with the self selection, I also am not even close to touching the medians there. However I think the huge PS plus the video and especially the very specific criteria for the why Berkeley essay is pretty crazy
I'm curious, how bold can one be in those videos? Is it worth making a satirical Jason Statham-action short if the adcoms have no sense of humor?
the more risk you take the higher chance of it backfiring
my instinct would be low humor bc if they have such a complex application I would feel hesitant to use a major part of it as a joke. They clearly take their admissions seriously and a joke video might convey the wrong thing at the wrong time. I think that humor is best put into a PS anecdote where it adds some shine to your personality
safe is always better
All good points
triplethread
11:34
@TheAdoptedOne: amazing
I almost did one for Vanderbilt and my idea was to do a documentary-style vid where I and others talked about me like it was an ESPN 30 for 30.
1a2b3c4d26z
11:36
I was risky in maybe one or two of my essays in that some parts read as slightly humorous, but I really tried to suss out the vibe for each school. I feel like Berk and UMich may be more accommodating of a more "out there" approach than other schools I applied to
1a2b3c4d26z
11:37
but that's literally just going off vibes
it looks like Berk vid is in response to a known prompt. My thinking is it may be a counter to AI by getting people to have to respond to what is essentially an essay prompt but on video
"I think really it’s more the USNWR change that emphasizes employment outcomes in school rankings. Schools want to admit people who have the skills to be more likely to land great jobs even more than before, and being a good interviewer is a very important for that. They want to see you have the soft skills." from a reddit comment
1a2b3c4d26z
11:38
One funny thing when talking to lawyers at work is that they will always say how they wish more law schools had interviews to make sure you can like... talk to people and form sentences
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.