Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

segregation

Read a random definition: mixed war

A quick definition of segregation:

Segregation is when people are separated from each other because of their race, gender, language, religion, nationality, or ethnicity. This separation can happen in everyday activities, at work, and in their rights as citizens. Sometimes, this separation is because of the law, and sometimes it happens in practice. In the past, there were laws in the United States that made it legal to separate people based on their race. This was called de jure segregation. Even after these laws were changed, some people still separated themselves from others based on race. This was called de facto segregation. It wasn't until the 1960s that the United States started to end segregation and treat everyone equally.

A more thorough explanation:

Segregation is the act of separating people based on their race, gender, religion, nationality, or ethnicity. It can happen in everyday activities, at work, and in the exercise of civil rights. Segregation can be either de jure (in law) or de facto (in practice).

  • Historically, in the United States, there were laws against interracial marriages and hiring people of certain ethnicities for jobs. These laws created de jure segregation.
  • Jim Crow laws in the southern United States imposed strict segregation of the "races" in public places, such as schools, buses, and restaurants. This was also de jure segregation.
  • Today, de facto segregation can be seen in neighborhoods where people of certain races or ethnicities tend to live together, creating a lack of diversity.

These examples illustrate how segregation can be enforced by laws or happen naturally in society. In both cases, it leads to the separation of people based on their identity, which can have negative effects on individuals and communities.

See generally | Seised

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.