Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

burden of going forward with evidence

Read a random definition: controversy

A quick definition of burden of going forward with evidence:

Term: Burden of Going Forward with Evidence

Definition: The burden of going forward with evidence is the responsibility of a party to present enough evidence on an issue to allow the fact-finder to make a decision. This is necessary to prevent a peremptory ruling, such as a summary judgment or directed verdict, from being made against the party. Essentially, it is the party's duty to provide enough evidence to support their case and prevent it from being dismissed without a fair hearing.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: The burden of going forward with evidence refers to a party's responsibility to present enough evidence on an issue to have it decided by the fact-finder, rather than being decided against the party in a peremptory ruling such as a summary judgment or a directed verdict. This is also known as the burden of production or the production burden.

Examples: If a plaintiff is suing a defendant for breach of contract, the burden of going forward with evidence would be on the plaintiff to present enough evidence to prove that a contract existed between the parties, that the defendant breached the contract, and that the plaintiff suffered damages as a result of the breach. If the plaintiff fails to present enough evidence on any of these issues, the case may be dismissed in favor of the defendant.

Another example would be in a criminal trial, where the burden of going forward with evidence would be on the prosecution to present enough evidence to prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. If the prosecution fails to present enough evidence, the defendant may be acquitted.

These examples illustrate how the burden of going forward with evidence is an important aspect of the legal system, as it ensures that cases are decided based on the evidence presented, rather than being dismissed or decided in favor of a party simply because they failed to present enough evidence.

bunkhouse rule | burden of pleading

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
that sucks :(
yeah were just ending the 4th week
lots of work, but manageable
It does. Really bad, I think my boss new I was crying in my car lolllll
sorry that sucks
That’s good! You got a good routine going?
It’s ok, we ball
we ball
Yesirrrr
yeah, try to get most of the readings done on the weekends so the weeks arent as bad
hurting for free time though
Quillinit
11:52
wasp i just looked at your cycle and did you like pee in the shoes of admissions officers?
the retroactive withdrawls really hurt me
made them question my ability to stick through law school
withdrawals in undergrad?
yeah 2 years of classes
Quillinit
11:57
ah you filed retro W's from classes in UG?
Quillinit
11:58
ah okay, sorry homie that's rough
it's fine i got into one of my top choices so im really happy
Quillinit
11:58
<3 happy for you
getting into cornell is hugeee
ayyyyy
Quillinit
11:59
^^^^^ would love to get into Cornell lmao
Quillinit
11:59
or anywhere!
you got it, believeeee
12:06
@letsseehowitgoesnow: you okay?
12:08
@ KnowledgeableRitzyWasp did u withdraw frm all your classes for two years or just a few? i have 2 W's
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.