Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

burden of production

Read a random definition: Atwood doctrine

A quick definition of burden of production:

The burden of production is when someone has to provide enough evidence to support what they are saying. This is important during a trial because it helps the judge and jury decide who is right. If someone doesn't provide enough evidence, the judge can dismiss the case. The burden of production is also called the "burden of going forward with evidence" or "production burden."

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: The burden of production is a party's responsibility to provide enough evidence to support a particular fact. It is combined with the burden of persuasion to make up the burden of proof throughout a trial. If a party satisfies the burden of production, they have established a prima facie case. The judge can dismiss a case if they believe the burden of production has not been met.

Examples: If a person is accused of stealing a car, the prosecution has the burden of production to provide evidence that the person actually stole the car. They may present video footage of the person taking the car, fingerprints found on the car, or witness testimony. If the prosecution fails to provide enough evidence, the judge may dismiss the case.

Another example is in a civil case where a person is suing for damages after a car accident. The plaintiff has the burden of production to provide evidence that the other driver was at fault for the accident. They may present witness testimony, police reports, or medical records. If the plaintiff fails to provide enough evidence, the case may be dismissed.

These examples illustrate how the burden of production requires a party to provide enough evidence to support their claim. If they fail to do so, the case may be dismissed.

burden of persuasion | burden of proof

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.