Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Calandra rule

Read a random definition: penetration pricing

A quick definition of Calandra rule:

Calandra Rule: The Calandra rule says that if someone is called to testify in front of a grand jury, they can be forced to answer questions about things that were obtained illegally by the police. This means that even if the police did something wrong, the grand jury can still ask questions about it. The Calandra rule was established in a court case called United States v. Calandra in 1974.

A more thorough explanation:

The Calandra rule is a legal doctrine that allows a grand-jury witness to be forced to answer questions about certain items, even if those items were obtained illegally by the police. This rule was established in the case of United States v. Calandra in 1974.

For example, let's say that the police illegally searched someone's home and found evidence of a crime. Even though the evidence was obtained illegally, a grand-jury witness could still be asked about that evidence and forced to answer questions about it under the Calandra rule.

This rule is controversial because it allows evidence obtained through illegal means to be used in certain circumstances. However, it is seen as necessary to ensure that grand-juries can fully investigate crimes and gather all relevant information.

Cairns's Act | calculated ambiguity

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.