Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: Criminal Liability

Read a random definition: scientific creationism

A quick definition of CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: Criminal Liability:

The CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 is a law that makes it illegal to send spam emails. If someone hacks into someone else's email or uses it without permission to send spam, they can be charged with a crime. This law has been challenged in court, but it has been found to be constitutional. The punishment for breaking this law is set by the United States Sentencing Commission.

A more thorough explanation:

The CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 is a law that regulates commercial email messages. Section 4 of this law makes certain spam-related activities a misdemeanor criminal offense. This means that people who engage in these activities can be charged with a crime and face penalties such as fines or imprisonment.

One example of a spam-related activity that can result in criminal liability is when a spammer hacks into someone else's email account and uses it to send out spam. Another example is when a spammer uses fraudulent means to gain access to someone else's email account and sends out spam from that account.

For instance, if a person hacks into their friend's email account and sends out spam emails to promote a product, they could be charged with a crime under the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003.

In 2007 and 2009, the constitutionality of these criminal prohibitions was challenged in court, but the courts upheld them as constitutional.

The United States Sentencing Commission provides guidelines for enforcing these criminal prohibitions.

CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: Core Requirements | CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: Enforcement by States

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.