Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: Enforcement by States

Read a random definition: jurisdictionis fundandae

A quick definition of CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: Enforcement by States:

The CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 is a law that helps stop spam emails. It says that state officials can take legal action against people who send spam emails that have false information, misleading subject lines, sexually explicit content, or don't let you unsubscribe. The state officials can ask for money to fix the problem and stop the spammer from doing it again. The government can also help the state officials.

A more thorough explanation:

The CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 is a law that regulates commercial email messages and gives recipients the right to stop receiving them. Section 7(f) of the Act allows state attorneys general, officials, or agencies to take legal action on behalf of the citizens of their state to enforce certain provisions of the Act.

To bring a civil action, the state attorney general, official, or agency must have reason to believe that the interests of the residents of their state have been or are being threatened or adversely affected by a person who:

  1. Includes false or misleading information in a spam email
  2. Uses a deceptive subject line in a spam email
  3. Does not follow the legal requirements for emails containing sexually oriented material
  4. Does not allow recipients to opt-out of receiving spam

If the state's legal action is successful, they may be awarded injunctive relief, actual monetary damages, or statutory damages. The court may also award attorneys' fees to the state attorney general, official, or agency that brought the action. Federal regulators, such as the Federal Trade Commission, may also intervene in the legal action.

An example of a violation of the CAN-SPAM Act that a state attorney general could take legal action against is a company that sends out spam emails with false information in the "From" field, making it appear as if the email is from a different sender. This violates Section 5(a)(1) of the Act.

Another example is a company that sends out spam emails with a subject line that is misleading or deceptive, such as "You've won a prize!" when the recipient has not actually won anything. This violates Section 5(a)(2) of the Act.

A third example is a company that sends out emails containing sexually oriented material without following the legal requirements for such emails, such as including a warning label in the subject line. This violates Section 5(d) of the Act.

Finally, a company that does not provide a clear and easy way for recipients to opt-out of receiving future spam emails could be in violation of Sections 5(a)(3), (4), or (5) of the Act. For example, if a company requires recipients to log in to their account to unsubscribe or makes the unsubscribe link difficult to find, this could be a violation.

CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: Criminal Liability | CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: Legislative Context and Background

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.