Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: Enforcement by States

Read a random definition: direct possession

A quick definition of CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: Enforcement by States:

The CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 is a law that helps stop spam emails. It says that state officials can take legal action against people who send spam emails that have false information, misleading subject lines, sexually explicit content, or don't let you unsubscribe. The state officials can ask for money to fix the problem and stop the spammer from doing it again. The government can also help the state officials.

A more thorough explanation:

The CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 is a law that regulates commercial email messages and gives recipients the right to stop receiving them. Section 7(f) of the Act allows state attorneys general, officials, or agencies to take legal action on behalf of the citizens of their state to enforce certain provisions of the Act.

To bring a civil action, the state attorney general, official, or agency must have reason to believe that the interests of the residents of their state have been or are being threatened or adversely affected by a person who:

  1. Includes false or misleading information in a spam email
  2. Uses a deceptive subject line in a spam email
  3. Does not follow the legal requirements for emails containing sexually oriented material
  4. Does not allow recipients to opt-out of receiving spam

If the state's legal action is successful, they may be awarded injunctive relief, actual monetary damages, or statutory damages. The court may also award attorneys' fees to the state attorney general, official, or agency that brought the action. Federal regulators, such as the Federal Trade Commission, may also intervene in the legal action.

An example of a violation of the CAN-SPAM Act that a state attorney general could take legal action against is a company that sends out spam emails with false information in the "From" field, making it appear as if the email is from a different sender. This violates Section 5(a)(1) of the Act.

Another example is a company that sends out spam emails with a subject line that is misleading or deceptive, such as "You've won a prize!" when the recipient has not actually won anything. This violates Section 5(a)(2) of the Act.

A third example is a company that sends out emails containing sexually oriented material without following the legal requirements for such emails, such as including a warning label in the subject line. This violates Section 5(d) of the Act.

Finally, a company that does not provide a clear and easy way for recipients to opt-out of receiving future spam emails could be in violation of Sections 5(a)(3), (4), or (5) of the Act. For example, if a company requires recipients to log in to their account to unsubscribe or makes the unsubscribe link difficult to find, this could be a violation.

CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: Criminal Liability | CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: Legislative Context and Background

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 8 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
you too haha, i was super surprised to have received one so early not gonna lie
i heard the group interview is really chill and I'm kinda excited to do it
seems cool
13:14
Yeah, 7sage has a page that talks about the questions for each schools interview, GULC's seems unique
13:15
Idk how much of an effect it has on admissions chances but should be cool either way
ive heard the conversion rate for gulc group interview is pretty high even moreso if you have the stats
it's hard to say but i've also heard that the group interview is harder to get than the alumni interview. but who really knows tbh
im p sure they don't interview everyone and getting one this early should be a great sign!
13:16
Yeah I've heard the same ab the group interview
13:17
So maybe I'll see you in D.C. a year from now lmao
initiallaw
13:32
Speaking of stat twins kazuyamishima were exact stat twins lol
17:13
Anyone going to the UGA zoom thing on the 22nd?
17:16
My bad, 24th*
Idk, what's it for?
@Law-Guy: How'd you get the Vandy fee waiver?
17:32
What does going ur3 in 3 days mean at Uva 😅
that you will get UR2 in 3 more
17:33
somethings gotta give
I’m new. What’s the UR and UR2?
17:35
I already went ur2. It’s the 3rd status date change
17:35
@RustyWrangler: attend one of their virtual info sessions and they'll send you a fee waiver
@Law-Guy: Awesome, thanks! I'll sign up rn!
i'm not entirely sure
They've recently been sending a lot of interview invites
It means status change?
17:47
Someone said there is a wl/r wave coming but how can that even be predicted 😭
17:48
Where?
Quillinit
17:50
This is obviously not true for UVA. Past years show they don't send any non A results until December
boglue
18:05
this is gonna sound so dumb but what do yall mean when you say date change
18:07
So the date under “application under review” changes with each reader.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.