Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: Enforcement by States

Read a random definition: approach

A quick definition of CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: Enforcement by States:

The CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 is a law that helps stop spam emails. It says that state officials can take legal action against people who send spam emails that have false information, misleading subject lines, sexually explicit content, or don't let you unsubscribe. The state officials can ask for money to fix the problem and stop the spammer from doing it again. The government can also help the state officials.

A more thorough explanation:

The CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 is a law that regulates commercial email messages and gives recipients the right to stop receiving them. Section 7(f) of the Act allows state attorneys general, officials, or agencies to take legal action on behalf of the citizens of their state to enforce certain provisions of the Act.

To bring a civil action, the state attorney general, official, or agency must have reason to believe that the interests of the residents of their state have been or are being threatened or adversely affected by a person who:

  1. Includes false or misleading information in a spam email
  2. Uses a deceptive subject line in a spam email
  3. Does not follow the legal requirements for emails containing sexually oriented material
  4. Does not allow recipients to opt-out of receiving spam

If the state's legal action is successful, they may be awarded injunctive relief, actual monetary damages, or statutory damages. The court may also award attorneys' fees to the state attorney general, official, or agency that brought the action. Federal regulators, such as the Federal Trade Commission, may also intervene in the legal action.

An example of a violation of the CAN-SPAM Act that a state attorney general could take legal action against is a company that sends out spam emails with false information in the "From" field, making it appear as if the email is from a different sender. This violates Section 5(a)(1) of the Act.

Another example is a company that sends out spam emails with a subject line that is misleading or deceptive, such as "You've won a prize!" when the recipient has not actually won anything. This violates Section 5(a)(2) of the Act.

A third example is a company that sends out emails containing sexually oriented material without following the legal requirements for such emails, such as including a warning label in the subject line. This violates Section 5(d) of the Act.

Finally, a company that does not provide a clear and easy way for recipients to opt-out of receiving future spam emails could be in violation of Sections 5(a)(3), (4), or (5) of the Act. For example, if a company requires recipients to log in to their account to unsubscribe or makes the unsubscribe link difficult to find, this could be a violation.

CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: Criminal Liability | CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: Legislative Context and Background

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
they let me into the t14 cause im goofy
knuck if you buck
Is it possible that some universities just straight up ghost some people or are things just taking a lot longer this time around
this happens every cycle feels like
YouthfulUnknownManatee
14:37
some schools are taking longer than in years past i.e. ndls
eggan
14:37
@PlantMurkyReindeer: go to penn 2025 or 2024 and sort by application (ED/RD) it sorts A to Z and so all of ED should be together
I gotta couple emails saying things are Unprecedented this year since there’s a crazy increase in applications
eggan
14:38
wait you cant see it on the schools page just profile pages damn
I only got 2 WLs yall and they’re in the opposite direction from each other from where I live im nervous
“Application complete” “ can I know more” “no”
legallybrunettelily
14:47
i need loyola chicago to talk 2 me
@legallybrunettelily: did we get jimjohns
legallybrunettelily
14:48
not today :( they dont deliver to me and I didn't have time to drive from work
crimes
legallybrunettelily
14:48
tomorrow trust
(not that u didn't get it, but that they don't deliver)
legallybrunettelily
14:49
right like damn why my office out of your delivery region wtf
rude and unusual
also totally think that they need to change their hours bc jimjohns is the perfect post 7pm food. idk why they close at 7pm near me
legallybrunettelily
14:51
dude the one near me closes at 5
legallybrunettelily
14:51
like how is that even profitable for them
fr
just found out JJ is headquartered in Champaign, IL... UIUC LET ME INNNNNNNNN
legallybrunettelily
14:53
you shouldve applied to loyola we couldve suffered together
real my b :,(
legallybrunettelily
14:55
im fr so over this like can they just tell me
legallybrunettelily
14:55
i know yall seen my application just accept or deny me don't hold me up like this
when did u apply?
legallybrunettelily
14:57
jan
legallybrunettelily
14:58
bro and now i got tangypeacefulprawn playing in my face
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.