Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Canadian Anti-Spam Law of 2010: Administrative Framework

Read a random definition: authentic act

A quick definition of Canadian Anti-Spam Law of 2010: Administrative Framework:

Canadian Anti-Spam Law of 2010: Administrative Framework: The Canadian Anti-Spam Law of 2010 has rules to stop people from sending spam emails. The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) is the agency that makes sure people follow the rules. They can investigate and give big fines to people who break the rules. The biggest fine for a person is $1,000,000 and for a company is $10,000,000.

A more thorough explanation:

The Canadian Anti-Spam Law of 2010 includes clauses 14 through 46 that establish an administrative structure for enforcing the law. The primary agency responsible for enforcement is the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC), which has extensive powers to investigate and penalize violations of the law.

For example, the CRTC can impose monetary penalties for violations of the law. The maximum penalty for an individual is $1,000,000, and for corporate entities, it is $10,000,000.

The administrative framework is designed to ensure that the Canadian Anti-Spam Law is enforced effectively and that violators are held accountable for their actions. By giving the CRTC the power to investigate and penalize violators, the law aims to reduce the amount of spam and unwanted electronic messages that Canadians receive.

CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: Senate Commerce Committee Report | Canadian Anti-Spam Law of 2010: Content Requirements and Opt-Out

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
MIAMI A
[] AromaticTroubledDormouse
20:55
How does one know if they are UR1 or UR2?
[] AromaticTroubledDormouse
20:56
CONGRATS MACAQUE!
TY
got a random stanford email and almost had a heart attack
ALSO CONGRATS!
Congrats1!
21:15
Miami A, yall I'm so excited I could cry.
21:15
Feel like I can finally stop holding my breath!! Whew!!!
[] baddestbunny
22:16
every time I get accosted by a strange man who follows me around because my male coworkers were too busy talking to walk me back to my car I get closer to saying we need to bring back traditional gender roles
Dkk
22:32
Nice! @Macaque
Dkk
22:32
@Aromatic, Have to guess.
Dkk
22:33
That sucks @Bunny do you have to go to the hospital?
[] baddestbunny
22:40
I said accosted not assaulted
23:35
guys. my notre dame address just went long is this good or bad
1a2b3c4d26z
23:37
Oooooo me too
23:37
omg is this good or bad
Dkk
23:47
Idk if gender roles are gunna fix that then.
23:49
it looks like most people who applied in october last cycle didn't get a decision until january... does it even mean anything that our addresses went long??
hows ED 2 compared to ED 1?
Dkk
0:10
No idea
windyMagician
0:34
reporting live to say my ndls address also went long
does it mean anything ^
Dkk
2:21
NDLS and Fordham took a very long time last year. It's good info for people to know.
[] baddestbunny
4:29
let’s get after it boys and girls
Dkk
5:21
I gtg to bed soon.
Dkk
5:22
Big day today. Gunna be a crazy one. I will sleep through the first half.
good morning lsd it is 5 am EST
also jazzy my ndls address went long ages ago i sadly do not think it means anything
my stanford address also went long LOL i think at most it's an indicator it's under review
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.