Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Canadian Anti-Spam Law of 2010: Content Requirements and Opt-Out

Read a random definition: Sunday-closing law

A quick definition of Canadian Anti-Spam Law of 2010: Content Requirements and Opt-Out:

The Canadian Anti-Spam Law of 2010 requires that any commercial electronic message must include certain information. This includes identifying the sender and any person on whose behalf the message is sent, providing contact information for the sender or person on whose behalf the message is sent, and including an unsubscribe mechanism for recipients to opt-out of future messages. The unsubscribe mechanism must include an electronic or website address that is free to use and must be effectuated promptly, no later than 10 business days after the recipient indicates their wish to opt-out. The contact information and opt-out mechanism must remain valid for at least 60 days after the message is sent.

A more thorough explanation:

The Canadian Anti-Spam Law of 2010 has certain requirements for "commercial electronic messages". These messages must:

  • Identify the sender and any person on whose behalf the message is sent
  • Provide contact information for the sender or the person on whose behalf the message is sent
  • Include an "unsubscribe mechanism" for opting out of future messages

The "unsubscribe mechanism" must include an electronic or website address that can be used to indicate the wish to unsubscribe. Both the sender and the person on whose behalf the message is sent are responsible for ensuring that the opt-out is effectuated promptly, within 10 business days. They must also ensure that the contact information and opt-out address remain valid for at least 60 days after the message is sent.

An example of a commercial electronic message that would need to comply with the Canadian Anti-Spam Law would be an email from a company promoting a new product. The email would need to include the name of the company and any other person on whose behalf the message is sent, such as a marketing agency. It would also need to provide contact information for the company or agency, such as a phone number or email address. Finally, it would need to include an opt-out mechanism, such as a link to unsubscribe from future emails.

If the recipient of the email chooses to opt-out, the sender and the person on whose behalf the message is sent must ensure that the opt-out is processed within 10 business days. They must also ensure that the contact information and opt-out address remain valid for at least 60 days after the email is sent.

Canadian Anti-Spam Law of 2010: Administrative Framework | Canadian Anti-Spam Law of 2010: Core Requirements

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
choosingpeace
13:14
i didn't even see that yep fas
lilypadfrog
13:14
why does the Fulbright have so much weight? idgi
And several pubs, and solid we. pretty awesome app
texaslawhopefully
13:14
idk I feel like that Fulbright isn't that big of a diff, there's so many countries where it is easy to get
snow
13:14
im telling yall, sictycoffees and nothim are like prime kobe and shaq
texaslawhopefully
13:14
it is prolly they just had a great overall narrative and not KJD
13:14
^
13:14
KJD 🗑️ squad
Maybe a fulbright alone isnt insanity, but pairing it with several first author pubs is sick
13:15
Besides lion ur killin jt
texaslawhopefully
13:15
yeah half tuition at CLS is fantastic
Thank you! But lowkey my page a lil fake. Withdrew from UChi after missing the II and the fact my future wife wants to leave the midwest anyways (i cant lie its mainly the first reason tho)
13:16
UChi didn’t inv u but you hit cls w half
13:16
That’s crazy haha
Honestly no clue. I missed NU waves too. Quite frankly, I think my why chicago statements were very meh
My PS and DS were sort of emotion but ended on a happy note. My why chi’s also did a little emotional stuff and I think it might’ve hurt me a bit. No clue tho🤷🏽‍♂️
Trismegistus
13:17
im pubbed in a bar association does that not mean anything wtfffff :(
13:18
@ImpartialLion: water under the bridge for you now tbh 🔥
13:18
Wonder what HLS is doing w our apps tho
texaslawhopefully
13:18
at least you're wondering lol
texaslawhopefully
13:18
I had the II and then got R'd
lilypadfrog
13:19
guys am I part of this conversation i also have a good lsat and no acceptances. I want to feel included
Trismegistus
13:19
my own alma mater straight up ignoring me too
13:19
@lilypadfrog: ur not a kjd without work experience. Back off
I think I’m headed for the HLS WL. I heard that if you get off the WL, you put down your deposit before you hear your offer? Idk how i feel ab that
13:19
*
Every thursday, i still pretend like I have a chance at a II tho
13:20
Yeh my friend got it 5/15 last year… crazy late
13:20
Same same maybe tomorrow 😭
lilypadfrog
13:20
@sadpadresfan: :(
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.