Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

capitis aestimatio

Read a random definition: Public Contracts Act

A quick definition of capitis aestimatio:

Capitis aestimatio: This is a Latin term that means "valuing of a head." In history, it was used to determine the amount of money that had to be paid as a penalty for killing someone. This was called a wergild, which was a fixed value of a person's life. The wergild had to be paid by the killer's family to the family of the person who was killed to avoid a blood feud.

A more thorough explanation:

Capitis aestimatio is a Latin term that means "valuing of a head." In history, it referred to a monetary estimate of a person's life, which was used to assess a penalty for the person's slaying. This was also known as wergild, which was the fixed value of a person's life. It was the amount that a homicide's kindred had to pay to the kindred of the slain person to avoid a blood feud.

For example, if someone killed another person, their family would have to pay a certain amount of money to the family of the person who was killed. This was to compensate for the loss of the person's life and to prevent a blood feud between the two families. The amount of money paid was determined by the person's social status and other factors.

Another example is the effusio sanguinis, which was a legal term used in ancient Rome. It referred to the shedding of blood, and it was used to determine the severity of a crime. If someone shed blood intentionally, they would have to pay a fine or face other penalties.

These examples illustrate how capitis aestimatio was used in history to value a person's life and to determine the penalty for taking someone's life. It was a way to prevent blood feuds and to ensure that justice was served.

capitation tax | capitis deminutio

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.