Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

carrying back the date of invention

Read a random definition: Simple trust

A quick definition of carrying back the date of invention:

Carrying back the date of invention refers to the process of removing a publication, U.S. patent, or foreign patent that has been cited as prior art against a patent application. This is done by filing an affidavit or declaration that proves the applicant completed the invention in the U.S. or another NAFTA or WTO member country before the effective date of the cited reference. This term only applies to U.S. patent applications. An issued patent can also antedate a prior-art reference if the conception predates the prior art and the inventor used due diligence in reducing the concept to practice. Other terms for carrying back the date of invention include antedating a reference, swearing behind a prior-art reference, and antedating of a prior-art reference.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Carrying back the date of invention is the process of antedating a prior-art reference in a patent application. This involves removing a publication, a U.S. patent, or a foreign patent cited as prior art against the application by filing an affidavit or declaration establishing the applicant's completion of the invention in this country or another NAFTA or WTO member country before the effective date of the cited reference.

Example: If a patent application cites a prior art reference that was published on January 1, 2020, the applicant can carry back the date of invention by providing evidence that they completed the invention before January 1, 2020. This can be done by filing an affidavit or declaration that proves the completion of the invention in the United States or another NAFTA or WTO member country before the effective date of the cited reference.

This process is only applicable to U.S. patent applications. An issued patent may also antedate a prior-art reference if the conception predates the prior art, and the inventor used due diligence in reducing the concept to practice.

carrying away | carrying charge

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.