Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

carrying back the date of invention

Read a random definition: fiat

A quick definition of carrying back the date of invention:

Carrying back the date of invention refers to the process of removing a publication, U.S. patent, or foreign patent that has been cited as prior art against a patent application. This is done by filing an affidavit or declaration that proves the applicant completed the invention in the U.S. or another NAFTA or WTO member country before the effective date of the cited reference. This term only applies to U.S. patent applications. An issued patent can also antedate a prior-art reference if the conception predates the prior art and the inventor used due diligence in reducing the concept to practice. Other terms for carrying back the date of invention include antedating a reference, swearing behind a prior-art reference, and antedating of a prior-art reference.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Carrying back the date of invention is the process of antedating a prior-art reference in a patent application. This involves removing a publication, a U.S. patent, or a foreign patent cited as prior art against the application by filing an affidavit or declaration establishing the applicant's completion of the invention in this country or another NAFTA or WTO member country before the effective date of the cited reference.

Example: If a patent application cites a prior art reference that was published on January 1, 2020, the applicant can carry back the date of invention by providing evidence that they completed the invention before January 1, 2020. This can be done by filing an affidavit or declaration that proves the completion of the invention in the United States or another NAFTA or WTO member country before the effective date of the cited reference.

This process is only applicable to U.S. patent applications. An issued patent may also antedate a prior-art reference if the conception predates the prior art, and the inventor used due diligence in reducing the concept to practice.

carrying away | carrying charge

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.