Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

case-or-controversy requirement

Read a random definition: locus publicus

A quick definition of case-or-controversy requirement:

The case-or-controversy requirement is a rule that says federal courts can only hear cases that involve a real problem or disagreement. They can't just give opinions on hypothetical situations. This means that people have to actually be in a dispute for a court to get involved. The terms "case" and "controversy" mean pretty much the same thing, but "controversy" is a smaller word that only applies to civil lawsuits.

A more thorough explanation:

The case-or-controversy requirement is a constitutional rule that states that for a federal court to hear a case, there must be an actual dispute involved.

For example, if someone wants to sue their neighbor for playing loud music at night, they can only do so if they have actually been affected by the noise. If they have not been affected, then there is no actual dispute, and the case cannot be heard in federal court.

This requirement is important because it ensures that federal courts only hear cases that have a real impact on people's lives. It prevents people from using the court system to ask hypothetical questions or to seek advisory opinions.

case number | case plan

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
why would you withdraw girl
15:38
@ImpartialLion: nah cuz there’s no way of knowing if they would’ve sent u an II later on
15:38
Isn’t uchicago like Top 4 tho
choosingpeace
15:38
@cumsock: they said there's like nothing to do there lol
choosingpeace
15:38
ive never been so i was just like ohhh
texaslawhopefully
15:38
UChicago is number one
^ period
u know it was a double thing. I missed II and my gf didn't want to live in the midwest anymore
15:39
But it’s fucking uchicago thooo LOL
15:39
I
15:40
Makes sense tho
cumsock
15:40
@choosingpeace: there’s plenty to do in Philly 😂 it’s a giant city
So after missing the II, I was like whatever. Maybe it's a sign to withdraw
nah making decisions off the gf is out of pocket
nahhhhh we been together since 10th grade
texaslawhopefully
15:40
I guess it depends what your goals are. If it's generic biglaw, CLS will get you the same outcome
6 yrs on January 30th
lilypadfrog
15:40
awwww <3 i love love
I also like CLS for liberal clerking. approx 41 FCOA clerks per yr
It's there if I excel. if not then I'm chill with sticking to BL
texaslawhopefully
15:41
CLS is not even close to Chicago for clerking lmao
choosingpeace
15:41
wait would yall pick CLS or penn?
I didn't apply to either but I would pick penn
15:42
penn bc im in state
no no it's not. But I wouldn't clerk conservative, so idk about Chi #s for myself
cumsock
15:42
Penn
texaslawhopefully
15:42
I guess that's fair. From what I've heard UChicago for conservatives is on par w/ HYS for clerkships
texaslawhopefully
15:42
not sure about for liberals
cumsock
15:43
They’re very similar tho
cumsock
15:43
Both t6 ivies
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.