Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

cause-of-action estoppel

Read a random definition: commerce

A quick definition of cause-of-action estoppel:

Cause-of-action estoppel, also known as collateral estoppel, is a legal principle that says if a court has already decided an issue in a case, the same issue cannot be re-litigated in a different case between the same parties. This means that if a court has already made a decision on a particular matter, that decision is final and cannot be changed in future cases. It is like a rule that helps to prevent people from arguing about the same thing over and over again.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Cause-of-action estoppel is a legal principle that prevents a party from relitigating an issue that has already been decided in a previous lawsuit, even if the new lawsuit involves a different claim. This is also known as collateral estoppel or issue preclusion.

Examples:

  • Defensive collateral estoppel: A defendant in a personal injury lawsuit is sued for negligence in causing a car accident. The defendant was previously sued for the same accident by another plaintiff and was found not to be at fault. The defendant can use cause-of-action estoppel to prevent the plaintiff in the current lawsuit from relitigating the issue of fault.
  • Offensive collateral estoppel: A plaintiff sues a company for breach of contract. The company had previously been sued by another plaintiff for the same breach of contract and was found to have breached the contract. The plaintiff in the current lawsuit can use cause-of-action estoppel to prevent the company from relitigating the issue of whether it breached the contract.

These examples illustrate how cause-of-action estoppel can be used to prevent parties from relitigating issues that have already been decided in previous lawsuits. This helps to promote judicial efficiency and finality of judgments.

CAUSE OF ACTION | causidicus

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah, she's an immigrant from post soviet country, born and raised there - i understand where she is coming from, american culture is way different.
yeah yeah exactly. +1 for lsat demon a lot of people who don’t like 7sage end up liking demon
does lsat demon accept lsac fee waiver
14:46
@VolatileClumsyAcolyte: yes very easy
14:47
to apply it. I love it- looking like a 155-170+ in a few months for me
oh i just checked, i still have to pay even if i have a fee waiver, damn
14:48
imo go basic with FW, then when (if) you run out of questions/tests, upgrade OR just take tests /drill on lawhib
14:48
the long sleep
ill give a free edition a try first, if i like then i will purchase. they have 3 free tests, right?
14:50
oh yea obi go free- yes 3 free tests. yes they can be crude/'mean' but they explain all 5 answers and when u upgrade they have good write ups on ea question
ill start prepping in january and aim for august lsat or september even. would it look bad if i have 3-4 attempts on my record? I already took it twice and cancelled my first score so im bit worried about that lol
nope lots of people take the lsat 3-4 times
14:59
@VolatileClumsyAcolyte: is it bad: some schools seem to prefer 1 and done vs 2+ takes. Is it better for you? If score much higher- yes. Overall, if it makes sense for u go for it
you might have to write an addendum though, but schools really want higher medians so if they see a big number that's all they honestly care about
14:59
^^^
CLS is my dream school and the only reason I am considering reapplying is to probably score higher and have better chances there, so fingers crossed they're chill about it
15:05
with that targeted goal/ willingness to take a year to improve score, and from what you have said, it seems like a great option to reapply early next cycle w/ a higher score. best of luck!
15:09
guys is there any chance for me to get into T14s? I applied to some but was convinced to apply to the rest, just feel its too late in the cycle for my stats (170 3.68)
more likely than not you make it into at least one t14
15:14
Hey long time no see hahaha, the prob with that is it has the range of up to 172, Im only 170
15:14
If u have the top range at my stats, there's only like 9 ppl who made it into T14s
yeah but it's also including people below your stats
15:15
Yeah, really my issue is deciding whether to R&R or to just take UF law
also if you reduce the top end of lsat to 170, you have a 33% chance at NYU+columbia, 67% at NU, 33 at mich, 40% berk, 40% UCLA, 100% Cornell, and 50% gulc
realistically you would make it into at least one
15:16
I'm still waiting on a bunch of T14 so hopefully those stats are a good indicator
15:16
idk wait it out - if good offer take if no good offer R&R
i dont think you need to R&R im pretty sure you make it into at least one t14
but if you apply earlier its just a lot easier
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.