Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Clayton Act

Read a random definition: baron et feme

A quick definition of Clayton Act:

The Clayton Act is a law that was created in 1914 to change another law called the Sherman Act. It says that companies can't do certain things that might make it hard for other companies to compete with them. For example, they can't charge different prices to different customers, force customers to buy one product if they want another, or make deals with other companies that stop other companies from selling their products. They also can't merge with other companies or have people on their board of directors who work for other companies that they compete with. If they do these things, it might be against the law and they could get in trouble.

A more thorough explanation:

The Clayton Act is a federal law that was passed in 1914 to amend the Sherman Act. Its purpose is to prevent anti-competitive practices in the marketplace and protect consumers from monopolies.

The Clayton Act prohibits several practices that could harm competition, including:

  • Price discrimination: This is when a seller charges different prices to different buyers for the same product or service.
  • Tying arrangements: This is when a seller requires a buyer to purchase one product or service in order to get another product or service.
  • Exclusive-dealing contracts: This is when a seller requires a buyer to only purchase products or services from them and not from their competitors.
  • Mergers and interlocking directorates: This is when two or more companies merge or when a person serves as a director for two or more competing companies.

If any of these practices have the effect of substantially lessening competition or creating a monopoly in any line of commerce, they are prohibited by the Clayton Act.

For example, if a company that sells smartphones charges different prices to different customers based on their race or gender, this would be price discrimination and would violate the Clayton Act. Similarly, if a company that sells printers requires customers to also purchase ink cartridges from them, this would be a tying arrangement and would also violate the Clayton Act.

clawback | CLE

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.