Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Clean Air Act (CAA)

Read a random definition: irrevocable

A quick definition of Clean Air Act (CAA):

The Clean Air Act (CAA) is a law that makes sure the air we breathe is clean and safe. It has rules for different kinds of pollution and where it comes from. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) makes sure that there are standards for different kinds of pollution, like ozone, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, particulate matter, nitrogen dioxide, and lead. These standards are called National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and they make sure that the air we breathe is healthy. Places that follow these standards are called Attainment Areas, and places that don't are called Non-Attainment Areas. The CAA also has rules for how to control pollution from different sources, like factories and cars. States have to make plans to follow these rules and make sure their air is clean.

A more thorough explanation:

The Clean Air Act (CAA) is a law that sets national standards for air pollution and its sources. It has two parts: regulating air quality levels and regulating sources of pollution. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is responsible for enforcing the CAA.

The CAA requires the EPA to identify and regulate pollutants that endanger public health and are emitted from diverse sources. These are called "criteria pollutants." Currently, there are six criteria pollutants:

  • Ozone
  • Carbon monoxide
  • Sulfur dioxide
  • Particulate matter
  • Nitrogen dioxide
  • Lead

The EPA regularly considers adding pollutants to the criteria list. Criteria pollutants are subject to National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). NAAQS regulations require any given criteria pollutant to stay below a level that protects public health with an adequate margin of safety.

Areas that comply with all NAAQS criteria pollutant standards are called Attainment Areas. Places that fail to comply with at least one criteria pollutant standard are called Non-Attainment Areas. Attainment Areas and Non-Attainment Areas are subject to different standards and regulations.

The CAA requires all states to create a State Implementation Plan (SIP) detailing how they intend to force their Non-Attainment areas to achieve the NAAQS standards. States have a wide range of freedom in which regulatory measures/non-regulatory measures they include in their SIPs to meet the required standards. If the EPA feels a proposed SIP will not achieve the NAAQS requirements, they can establish a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) and mandate the state follow it.

Pollution regulation under the CAA depends on whether the source emitting the pollution is stationary or mobile. For stationary sources, the level of pollution control technology required depends on if the area is an attainment area or a non-attainment area.

Attainment areas require Best Available Control Technology (BACT). Non-Attainment areas require higher standards. New/modified major sources of air pollution must employ control technology with the lowest achievable emission rate (LAER), and existing sources must use reasonably available control technology (RACT).

For mobile sources of air pollution, the EPA focuses on both the fuel going into the vehicle and the emissions that are coming out. Mobile sources of pollution tend to emit a large quantity of carbon dioxide, a non-criteria pollutant. Nonetheless, the Supreme Court held in Mass v. EPA that the EPA can regulate carbon dioxide emissions from mobile sources and is required to do so.

For example, if a factory in a Non-Attainment Area emits too much sulfur dioxide, the state must create a plan to reduce the emissions to meet the NAAQS standards. The state can require the factory to install new pollution control technology to reduce emissions. If the state's plan is not effective, the EPA can create a plan and require the state to follow it.

Another example is regulating the emissions from cars. The EPA sets standards for the amount of pollutants that can come out of a car's tailpipe. The EPA also sets standards for the fuel that goes into the car. This helps reduce the amount of pollution that cars emit into the air.

Clayton Antitrust Act | clean energy

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
11:11
@EvolBunny: im a uki
babycat
11:11
terrible admin
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
11:11
@babycat: I wonder why gtown felt what they said was a good idea and how secure that individual felt in their job to believe there would be no backlash.
Dkk
11:11
please, tell me more about Europa: The Last Battle @MostlyLegal
11:11
nothing you dont already know
Dkk
11:12
Lmfao, damn out of messages again. Time to go sit in the hot tub.
11:12
@BulbasaurNoLikeCardio: honestly fuck these schools
11:12
The way they act is so cringe and gives mad ick
babycat
11:12
@BulbasaurNoLikeCardio: people are saying this has been a pattern with them
babycat
11:12
imagine being a religious school and not supporting mothers. practice what you preach!
11:12
Fuck dem hoes
11:13
Child bearing people*
11:13
i cant spell fuck dont correct me
11:15
Anywayyyyy, i think today i will withdraw all my apps
11:15
This lsat is not doing it
babycat
11:15
lol live ur truth
11:15
ASU at 154 is damn good
11:15
154 scholly
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
11:15
It is shitty that was a pattern of behavior but I am glad someone is finally standing up for themselves. Like I can be a pretty rigid butthole guy when it comes to getting stuff but a complete lack of empathy or situational awareness shown by the school and their staff is mind blowing. When I was talking about it in the office they all thought I was lying cause it sounds so crazy.
Dkk
11:16
@babycat: ahh link me something. Idk what you are talking about with GTown and mothers and all that.
11:16
Idk if any of you watch UFC but one time interim heavyweight champ Tom Aspinall won a fight and said on the mic afterwards “if you feel scared to do something, that’s a pretty good sign you should just go fucking do it” and I believe that applies very much to people wondering if they should R&R. Sure you can but why not just see what happens now?
babycat
11:16
School fucked up so bad they got hellwoods to sign a petition
11:16
Ive also heard their career center is awful too, I think its why it will never be anything but 14-15
JumpySubsequentDolphin
11:17
@Dkk: i think a law student was pregnant and due to give birth a few days before finals and they refused to accomodate her
JumpySubsequentDolphin
11:17
accommodate*
11:17
@Mostlylegal: yeah and i was thinking fuck it just go party for three years but i got other options and need to start building, top law schools were worth that 3 year pause but i am not sure i can do that for asu and their outcomes
11:19
Also I just got diagnosed with ADHD is it stupid if I dont take the test again now that Im medicated?
Dkk
11:19
She offered to take it early? Should have given her that one. Remote I can understand saying no to but taking it early, yes.
babycat
11:20
big things coming for babycat. I own a resistance band now
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.