Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Clean Air Act (CAA)

Read a random definition: Federal Bureau of Investigation

A quick definition of Clean Air Act (CAA):

The Clean Air Act (CAA) is a law that makes sure the air we breathe is clean and safe. It has rules for different kinds of pollution and where it comes from. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) makes sure that there are standards for different kinds of pollution, like ozone, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, particulate matter, nitrogen dioxide, and lead. These standards are called National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and they make sure that the air we breathe is healthy. Places that follow these standards are called Attainment Areas, and places that don't are called Non-Attainment Areas. The CAA also has rules for how to control pollution from different sources, like factories and cars. States have to make plans to follow these rules and make sure their air is clean.

A more thorough explanation:

The Clean Air Act (CAA) is a law that sets national standards for air pollution and its sources. It has two parts: regulating air quality levels and regulating sources of pollution. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is responsible for enforcing the CAA.

The CAA requires the EPA to identify and regulate pollutants that endanger public health and are emitted from diverse sources. These are called "criteria pollutants." Currently, there are six criteria pollutants:

  • Ozone
  • Carbon monoxide
  • Sulfur dioxide
  • Particulate matter
  • Nitrogen dioxide
  • Lead

The EPA regularly considers adding pollutants to the criteria list. Criteria pollutants are subject to National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). NAAQS regulations require any given criteria pollutant to stay below a level that protects public health with an adequate margin of safety.

Areas that comply with all NAAQS criteria pollutant standards are called Attainment Areas. Places that fail to comply with at least one criteria pollutant standard are called Non-Attainment Areas. Attainment Areas and Non-Attainment Areas are subject to different standards and regulations.

The CAA requires all states to create a State Implementation Plan (SIP) detailing how they intend to force their Non-Attainment areas to achieve the NAAQS standards. States have a wide range of freedom in which regulatory measures/non-regulatory measures they include in their SIPs to meet the required standards. If the EPA feels a proposed SIP will not achieve the NAAQS requirements, they can establish a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) and mandate the state follow it.

Pollution regulation under the CAA depends on whether the source emitting the pollution is stationary or mobile. For stationary sources, the level of pollution control technology required depends on if the area is an attainment area or a non-attainment area.

Attainment areas require Best Available Control Technology (BACT). Non-Attainment areas require higher standards. New/modified major sources of air pollution must employ control technology with the lowest achievable emission rate (LAER), and existing sources must use reasonably available control technology (RACT).

For mobile sources of air pollution, the EPA focuses on both the fuel going into the vehicle and the emissions that are coming out. Mobile sources of pollution tend to emit a large quantity of carbon dioxide, a non-criteria pollutant. Nonetheless, the Supreme Court held in Mass v. EPA that the EPA can regulate carbon dioxide emissions from mobile sources and is required to do so.

For example, if a factory in a Non-Attainment Area emits too much sulfur dioxide, the state must create a plan to reduce the emissions to meet the NAAQS standards. The state can require the factory to install new pollution control technology to reduce emissions. If the state's plan is not effective, the EPA can create a plan and require the state to follow it.

Another example is regulating the emissions from cars. The EPA sets standards for the amount of pollutants that can come out of a car's tailpipe. The EPA also sets standards for the fuel that goes into the car. This helps reduce the amount of pollution that cars emit into the air.

Clayton Antitrust Act | clean energy

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
12:12
@MrThickRopes: maybe they'll spoil us and it'll be 3:59 😊🤞🏻 You hear from Bama yet?
MrThickRopes
12:13
no
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
12:16
@MrThickRopes: That's alright! At least you
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
12:16
At least you
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
12:16
FUCK
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
12:16
At least you are still in the running
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
12:16
There! Got it! :)
MrThickRopes
12:19
Thank u
When will NYU release more As
Mostlylegal
12:53
I believe in fo pm, the great admissions team, maker of As and schollys.
Mostlylegal
12:54
And in mr thick ropes, their only son
[] c0bra1
13:00
do you have to get new recommendations if you reapply
[] c0bra1
13:00
or can you reuse one of them
180letmein
13:00
I think they say you can reuse recommendations
180letmein
13:00
Just make sure to let your recommenders know
[] c0bra1
13:00
gotcha
180letmein
13:00
That you're gonna use it again. But that's just courtesy
[] c0bra1
13:01
thinking about reapplying if i manage to get a yob in the next month or so
[] c0bra1
13:01
we'll see
babycakes
13:03
As an R&Rer i can tell you your recommendations stay in LSAC for like five years or something and you don’t have to re-request them
babycakes
13:04
And you don’t have to get new ones
babycakes
13:06
I am an R&R advocate if you know you can do better on the LSAT or write better essays or you just want more time to figure out what you’re doing with your life. Was a really good choice for me
ClassyPleasantHeron
13:07
You can re-use recommendations, but if you're reapplying and expecting different results, you should get at least one new/updated recommendation.
[] c0bra1
13:16
im maxed on lsat so id only reapply for a lucrative and decently protected job offer, at which point yeah id get a new recommendation from whoever i work for
[] c0bra1
13:16
i wish you didnt have to waive viewing rights to recommendations tbh i wanna know what they're sayin about me
[] c0bra1
13:17
i also heard that if you reapply somewhere you got accepted from originally they dont like it? or something? is that actually true or just speculation
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:21
I've heard that too---which is tough, because what if the only problem was funding? (Or in that case can you defer and try to renegotiate scholarship or something?)
[] c0bra1
13:24
yeahh and i don't know how picky schools are about the deferment reason - idk if "i want to work so i can make money and come back later" is an approved reason lol
[] c0bra1
13:24
and even then its 1 year at max
[] c0bra1
13:24
well at least i have a month and a half to think about it
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.