Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

clear and convincing evidence

Read a random definition: supremacy

A quick definition of clear and convincing evidence:

Clear and convincing evidence is a type of proof that is needed to prove certain things in court. It is harder to prove than just a little bit of evidence, but not as hard as proving something without any doubt. This type of proof is used in both criminal and civil trials. It means that the evidence is very likely to be true, and the person deciding the case must be convinced that it is probably true. Some things that need clear and convincing evidence include cases involving fraud, wills, and taking someone off life support.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Clear and convincing evidence is a standard of proof that must be met in certain convictions or judgments. It is a more rigorous standard than preponderance of the evidence, but less rigorous than proving evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. This standard is used in both civil and criminal trials.

The Supreme Court in Colorado v. New Mexico, 467 U.S. 310 (1984), defined clear and convincing evidence as evidence that is highly and substantially more likely to be true than untrue. This means that the fact finder must be convinced that the contention is highly probable.

Examples of cases that require clear and convincing evidence include:

For example, in a gift causa mortis case, the court may require clear and convincing evidence that the gift occurred during the decedent's lifetime. This means that the evidence presented must be highly and substantially more likely to be true than untrue, and the fact finder must be convinced that the gift occurred.

Cleaning Fee | clear and present danger

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.