Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

clearly erroneous

Read a random definition: Unfair competition

A quick definition of clearly erroneous:

The "clearly erroneous" standard is a rule used in court cases to review decisions made by judges. It means that if there is evidence to support a decision, but the reviewing court is convinced that a mistake was made, the decision can be reversed. This standard is only used for decisions about facts, not opinions. It is important because it helps ensure that decisions are based on accurate information and that mistakes are corrected.

A more thorough explanation:

The “clearly erroneous” standard is a legal term used in civil appellate proceedings. It means that a finding made by a judge is unsupported by substantial, credible evidence in the record. This standard is only applied to fact finding by judges.

For example, if a district court finds that a defendant is guilty of a crime, but the appellate court determines that there is no credible evidence to support that finding, the appellate court may reverse the finding. This is because the finding is “clearly erroneous”.

The “clearly erroneous” standard is considered to have minimal deference to the fact finder. This is because finding of facts are made based on evidentiary hearings and usually involve credibility determinations. However, this standard is not applied to questions of law.

Overall, the “clearly erroneous” standard is an important tool for ensuring that judicial findings are based on credible evidence and are not simply the result of bias or error.

clear title | clearly erroneous test

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
goofy-goober
15:36
I just wanna see my results man, waiting is so painful :~(
any word on scalia or any school lol
oakenrays
15:52
scalia is dead fortunately
oakenrays
15:52
law schools are coming out slowly but surely
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:03
@UnderRepresentedTryhard: Yes only for YM applicants tho
RoaldDahl
16:05
dodged the mich r wave what does this mean
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.