Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

collateral descent

Read a random definition: dram-shop act

A quick definition of collateral descent:

Collateral descent refers to the way that property is passed down from a common ancestor to relatives who are not in a direct line, like cousins or siblings. This is different from direct-line descent, which is when property is passed down from a parent to a child or grandparent to a grandchild. Mediate descent is when property is passed down through an intermediary, like a grandmother passing property to her granddaughter through the granddaughter's mother. Paternal-line descent is when property is passed down through the father's side of the family, while maternal-line descent is when property is passed down through the mother's side of the family.

A more thorough explanation:

Collateral descent refers to the process of inheriting property from a common ancestor through a non-direct line of relatives, such as cousins or siblings. This is different from direct-line descent, which is the passing of property from a parent to a child or grandparent to a grandchild.

For example, if a person dies without a will and has no children, their property may pass to their siblings or cousins through collateral descent. This means that the relatives are related to the deceased person through a common ancestor, such as a grandparent or great-grandparent.

Another example of collateral descent is when a person inherits property from their cousin, who inherited it from their shared grandparent. In this case, the two cousins are related through a common ancestor, but not through a direct line of descent.

collateral defense | collateral fact

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.