Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

community property

Read a random definition: foreign bill of exchange

A quick definition of community property:

Community property is when a married couple owns everything they get during their marriage together. This includes things like money, property, and even debt. Some states have community property laws, which means that both spouses own everything equally, no matter who earned it or bought it. Other states have different laws about who owns what.

A more thorough explanation:

Community property refers to assets that are acquired during a marriage by either spouse. This can include property, income, and even debt. In some states, such as California, any income, real estate, or other property acquired by either spouse during the marriage belongs to both spouses. This means that both spouses own everything equally, regardless of who purchased it or earned the income.

  • John and Jane get married and buy a house together. In a community property state, both John and Jane would own the house equally, even if only one of them paid for it.
  • Samantha and David get married and David starts a business. In a community property state, Samantha would have a legal claim to half of the income generated by the business, even if she did not contribute to it directly.
  • Mark and Lisa get married and Lisa has student loan debt. In a community property state, Mark would be responsible for half of the debt, even if he did not take out the loans.

These examples illustrate how community property laws can affect the ownership and responsibility of assets acquired during a marriage. It is important to understand the laws in your state and how they may impact your financial situation.

community interest development | community property with right of survivorship

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.