Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

constitutional malice

Read a random definition: Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act

A quick definition of constitutional malice:

Constitutional malice is when someone intentionally does something wrong without any good reason or excuse. It can also mean that someone acted recklessly and didn't care about the law or other people's rights. This kind of malice is important in cases of defamation, where someone says something false about another person on purpose or with reckless disregard for the truth. To prove constitutional malice, the person who was harmed must show that the person who caused the harm knew what they were doing was wrong or didn't care about the consequences.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Constitutional malice is a legal term that refers to the deliberate intent to commit an injury, as evidenced by external circumstances. It is also known as actual malice and is characterized by reckless disregard of the law or of a person's legal rights.

For example, in a defamation case, if a person knowingly publishes a false statement or shows reckless disregard for the truth, they can be found to have acted with constitutional malice. This means that they intentionally caused harm to the person they defamed and did so without any justification or excuse.

Another example of constitutional malice is when a police officer uses excessive force against a suspect, knowing that it is illegal and violates the suspect's constitutional rights. In this case, the officer acted with deliberate intent to cause harm and disregarded the law and the suspect's legal rights.

Overall, constitutional malice is a serious legal concept that involves intentional harm and disregard for the law and legal rights. It is often used in cases of defamation, police brutality, and other situations where intentional harm has been caused.

constitutional majority | constitutional monarchy

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.