Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

constitutional taking

Read a random definition: no cause of action

A quick definition of constitutional taking:

A constitutional taking is when the government takes someone's private property without their permission or destroys it, making it unusable. This can happen when the government needs the property for public use, like building a road or a park. The property owner is entitled to compensation for their loss. There are different types of takings, like actual taking where the government physically takes the property, or temporary taking where the government takes the property for a limited time.

A more thorough explanation:

Constitutional taking is a legal term that refers to the government's acquisition of private property either by ousting the owner or by destroying the property or severely impairing its utility. This means that the government can take away someone's property, but they have to compensate the owner for it.

  • If the government wants to build a new highway and needs to take some land from a private owner, they must compensate the owner for the value of the land.
  • If the government takes away someone's property without compensating them, it is considered unconstitutional.

These examples illustrate how the government can take away someone's property, but they have to do it in a fair and legal way. If they don't compensate the owner, it is considered a violation of their constitutional rights.

constitutional right | constitutiones principum

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
Give it 4 more weeks at least. Everyone in this chat needs to wait longer.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.