Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

continuous servitude

Read a random definition: right of discussion

A quick definition of continuous servitude:

Continuous servitude is a type of easement, which is a right to use or control someone else's land for a specific purpose. The land that benefits from the easement is called the dominant estate, while the land burdened by the easement is called the servient estate. A continuous easement can be enjoyed without a deliberate act by the party claiming it, such as an easement for drains, sewer pipes, lateral support of a wall, or light and air. It is different from a discontinuous easement, which can only be enjoyed if the party claiming it deliberately acts in some way with regard to the servient estate.

A more thorough explanation:

Continuous servitude is a type of easement that can be enjoyed without a deliberate act by the party claiming it. This means that the easement can be used continuously without needing permission from the owner of the land. Examples of continuous servitude include easements for drains, sewer pipes, lateral support of a wall, or light and air.

For instance, if a property owner has an easement for light and air, they can enjoy the right to receive light and air through defined apertures without needing to ask for permission from the owner of the neighboring property. Similarly, if a property owner has an easement for lateral support of a wall, they can enjoy the right to have their wall supported by the neighboring property without needing to ask for permission.

Overall, continuous servitude is a type of easement that allows for the continuous use of a property without needing to ask for permission from the owner of the neighboring property.

continuous-representation doctrine | continuous-treatment doctrine

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 2 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
17:07
Not to mention that he's completely thrown away liberalism and classic western political philosophy, but yk your eggs will be cheaper so it's worth it
how bad are these tariffs gonna get for us everyday consumers?
@jackfrost11770: FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUu
jackfrost11770
17:08
FUCK THE NYPD
WASP HAHAHAHAHHA
texaslawhopefully
17:08
Estimates are about 4k fruitbat
YRDSL
17:08
im a 1 issue voter - if i want someone to be elected i vote for them
woof
texaslawhopefully
17:08
I've seen some that could be as high as 7k though
17:08
@jackfrost11770: ya prolly don't buy any lotto tickets tonite
get on that trump coin before the rug pull lol
Dkk
17:09
@BigStrongBug: I don't consider myself a one issue voter but if I had to pick one it would be gender relations.
i am a one issue voter for the economy, which is why i voted harris
texaslawhopefully
17:10
Here's a fairly well respected estimate fruitybat: The proposed tariffs could cost consumers an additional $2,500 to $7,600 a year per household, according to estimates, said Jonathan Gold, vice president of supply chain and customs policy for the National Retail Federation.
i am a voter so i voted
17:11
Lol what does gender relations mean
17:11
Like are you anti gay marriage?
texaslawhopefully
17:11
@Dkk: So you care about gender relations over the Constitution, institutional stability, the economy, political norms, etc.?
blue collar trump voters are gonna blame anything but him anyway when the price of their household consumption goes through the roof. I wonder how they'll spin that narrative.
17:11
Or are you an all inclusive hater and include trans folks too
texaslawhopefully
17:12
Even if you have conservative social values you still shouldn't like Trump lol, but that's a whole diff convo
I love when people prefer putting not talking about gender in schools at the top of the agenda instead of dealing with school shootings
this is going to blow your mind but once you realize women and men are more similar than different you will drown in pussy or dick
17:12
@HopefullyInLawSchool: $45k @ KS is really good. $145k is to attend it is not a bad deal
facts knowledgeable
Also love how he put an EO to leave the Paris climate agreement in the midst of the LA wildfires and places who haven’t gotten snow in 15 years now getting storms
@llama: it would only be 17,000 ish per year
17:15
yeah and i think after 1L u get in state? not certain
I dont think so based on my very brief research
17:16
hmm I know some school offer that in their offer (I also believe KS does not negotiate) but I wonder which schools would reconsider with a condition of in state after 1L yr?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.