Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

contributory-negligence doctrine

Read a random definition: expectant beneficiary

A quick definition of contributory-negligence doctrine:

The contributory-negligence doctrine is a legal principle that prevents a plaintiff from receiving any compensation if they are partially responsible for their own injury or damage. This means that if someone is even slightly at fault for their own harm, they cannot recover any damages from the other party. However, many states have replaced this doctrine with a comparative-negligence scheme, which allows plaintiffs to recover damages based on the percentage of fault assigned to each party involved.

A more thorough explanation:

The contributory-negligence doctrine is a legal principle that completely bars a plaintiff from recovering damages if they are partly at fault for the harm they suffered. For example, if a pedestrian jaywalks and gets hit by a car, the contributory-negligence doctrine would prevent them from recovering any damages from the driver.

However, most states have abolished this doctrine and replaced it with a comparative-negligence scheme. Under this scheme, the plaintiff's recovery is reduced by the percentage of their own fault. For instance, if the pedestrian in the previous example was found to be 25% at fault, they would only be able to recover 75% of the damages.

Overall, the contributory-negligence doctrine is a harsh rule that places a heavy burden on plaintiffs to prove that they were not at fault for their injuries. Its replacement with a comparative-negligence scheme has made it easier for injured parties to recover damages, even if they were partially responsible for the accident.

contributory | contributory pension plan

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.