Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

cozening

Read a random definition: color book

A quick definition of cozening:

Term: Cozening

Definition: Cozening is a bad thing people do when they cheat or trick others in a sneaky way. It's like when someone promises to do something but doesn't really mean it, or when they lie to get what they want. It's not a nice thing to do and it's against the rules. Sometimes it's also called cosening or stellionatus.

A more thorough explanation:

Cozening (pronounced kuh-zuh-ning) is a dishonest practice that involves cheating or fraudulent dealing. It is also known as cosening. In the past, it was an offense that was not specifically named, but it was considered a serious offense.

According to John Cowell's book, The Interpreter, cozening is a type of deceitful practice that can occur in or out of contracts. It is a form of fraud that cannot be fitly termed by any special name. In the civil law, it is called stellionatus.

Examples of cozening include:

  • A salesman who lies about the quality of a product to make a sale
  • A contractor who overcharges for a job and does not complete the work as promised
  • A person who forges a signature on a contract to make it seem like someone agreed to something they did not

These examples illustrate how cozening involves dishonesty and deception. It is a deliberate attempt to cheat or defraud someone for personal gain.

cozen | C.P

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
CLS is my dream school and the only reason I am considering reapplying is to probably score higher and have better chances there, so fingers crossed they're chill about it
15:05
with that targeted goal/ willingness to take a year to improve score, and from what you have said, it seems like a great option to reapply early next cycle w/ a higher score. best of luck!
15:09
guys is there any chance for me to get into T14s? I applied to some but was convinced to apply to the rest, just feel its too late in the cycle for my stats (170 3.68)
more likely than not you make it into at least one t14
15:14
Hey long time no see hahaha, the prob with that is it has the range of up to 172, Im only 170
15:14
If u have the top range at my stats, there's only like 9 ppl who made it into T14s
yeah but it's also including people below your stats
15:15
Yeah, really my issue is deciding whether to R&R or to just take UF law
also if you reduce the top end of lsat to 170, you have a 33% chance at NYU+columbia, 67% at NU, 33 at mich, 40% berk, 40% UCLA, 100% Cornell, and 50% gulc
realistically you would make it into at least one
15:16
I'm still waiting on a bunch of T14 so hopefully those stats are a good indicator
15:16
idk wait it out - if good offer take if no good offer R&R
i dont think you need to R&R im pretty sure you make it into at least one t14
but if you apply earlier its just a lot easier
15:17
thats odd I didn't see those stats, but ok. We talked abt this awhile back and I'm working on Columbia + Berkeley rn then Cornell, probs is I'm not gonna produce good Why X's before the 25th but whatever
https://www.lsd.law/search/cV9E6 this is artificially deflated because it's only below your stats
someone got into harvard and chicago with your stats
15:19
Why is that deflating it? isnt that a better indicator instead of choosing above median LSATs? Genuinely curious just wondering
when stats are close because of the variability you want a little above your stats and a little below to get more data, adcoms arent so finnicky that 2 points on the lsat is make or break unless it puts you above median, and even then 50% are below median so it's not as big of an impact as you might think. the reason the chanceme tool goes a little above and below your stats by default is to capture a more accurate picture
ie your softs/WE/essays might make you more or less competitive than any random applicant and the best way to account for that is to take a little above and a little below
15:21
got it, I was of the mindset that medians are pretty concrete so taking a +2 LSAT score range was just giving me irrelevant data. Thank you
15:21
Def my softs/essays are the strongest part of my application so hoping they shine through
they kind of are but you see with the data here is doesnt really change your chances going from 172 to 170
yeah youll be in a good place for this cycle
15:22
yeah I guess thats true, I've also been looking at "Included" not "Only" for URM so maybe that's a diff too
15:22
Appreciate it man!
yeah included is giving you data for nURM which isnt relevant for your cycle
and ofc, good luck :)
15:24
Holiday messages from law schools should be illegal
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.