Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

credit card fraud

Read a random definition: substitute drawing

A quick definition of credit card fraud:

Credit card fraud is when someone steals another person's credit card information and uses it to buy things or take money from the account without permission. This is a type of identity theft. The law says that the victim is only responsible for up to $50 of the stolen money, but most banks will forgive this if the victim explains what happened. There are two main types of credit card fraud: application fraud and account takeover. Application fraud is when someone opens a credit card account in another person's name and uses it to take out money. Account takeover is when someone takes control of an existing credit card account and uses it to buy things. Sometimes, employees at businesses can steal credit card information and sell it to thieves. With online shopping, thieves can steal credit card information without even having the physical card. This is why it's important to check your credit report regularly and be careful with your personal information.

A more thorough explanation:

Credit card fraud is a type of identity theft where someone steals another person's credit card information to make unauthorized purchases or withdraw funds from the account. Federal law limits the cardholder's liability to $50 in case of credit card theft, but most banks waive this amount if the cardholder signs an affidavit explaining the theft.

There are two main types of credit card fraud: application fraud and account takeover. Application fraud happens when someone opens a credit card account in another person's name using their personal information. The fraudster then uses the new credit card to take out large amounts of cash, leaving the victim to pay the debt. Account takeover occurs when a criminal hijacks an existing credit card account by obtaining enough personal information to change the account's billing address. They then report the card lost or stolen to get a new card and make fraudulent purchases with it.

Another common method used to achieve an account takeover is called "skimming." Skimming schemes occur when employees of businesses illicitly access customers' credit card information. They then either sell the information to identity thieves or hijack the victim's identities themselves.

Technological advances have also created avenues for credit card fraud. With the rise of online purchasing, perpetrators no longer need a physical card to make an unauthorized purchase. Additionally, electronic databases containing credit card data may be hacked or crash on their own, releasing customers' credit card information. These electronic database hacks put the security of many accounts at risk at once.

For example, if someone steals your credit card information and uses it to make purchases without your permission, that is credit card fraud. Another example is if a criminal obtains enough personal information about you to open a credit card account in your name and then uses it to make purchases, leaving you with the debt.

Credit CARD Act | credit counseling

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Minus those random R decisions from UMN yesterday though right? I wonder what happened there. I don’t think I’ve seen a school start the season out with anything but As on here
almost all of my apps have been UR for 6 weeks at this point I feel exhausted waiting for them to finish
Irvine is being snobby and wont start any review until end of Nov.
Yeah, it’s tough. I’m distracting myself by playing good video games after work :)
im distracting myself by schizo-scrolling r/lawschoolamissions and every conceivable data point on this godforsaken website
it is not working
Haaa I naturally want to do that too. I’m trying to stop. They need a surgeon general’s warning on this site for perspective law students
i spend more time on here then anything else trying to rationalize that the waves from last year will match waves for this year (they won't) and that the stats of people with the same stats are indicative of my own (they aren't)
There aren't many people in my stat range so I pretty much know every result in my range after being on here for a few years
9:28
congrats on the 172 bruce
go dawgs fr
9:29
roll tide
do we foresee a fordham election day wave today (i'm delusional)
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:31
I think so, Jack
9:31
some people hate him. some people love him, but he a real one: https://youtu.be/w5oEqiVQcF4?t=173
9:32
[kevin oleary]
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:34
I mean if Fordham doesn't release today I will purposefully get on a train, go to new york, and then take the stinkiest shit inside the admission office's toilet (potentially clogging it and forcing them to get a plumber)
IS IT ONLY ON MY END WHY DID THAT SEND TEN MILLION TIMES
HELLO
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:35
it sent a million times lol
WHAT HAPPENED
yeah i thought you were tweaking for a second
i'm so sorry everyone what the actual fuck this website hates me
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:35
Jack's just tweaking on LSD no biggie
to be fair this accurately represents my mental state
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.