Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

criminal intent

Read a random definition: negative proof

A quick definition of criminal intent:

Criminal intent, also known as mens rea, is the mental state required to convict someone of a crime. It's one of the fundamental aspects of criminal law, along with the criminal act. The specific intent needed to prove guilt varies depending on the crime and the state. In some states, criminal intent is split into four categories: purposely, knowingly, recklessly, and negligently. Each crime has an associated level of criminal intent necessary to sustain a conviction. Penalties for the same conduct increase as the mental state/specific intent increases. Some states follow common law doctrines of malice to determine liability. Express malice is deliberate intent to bring harm to the victim, while implied malice is indifference to harm that a victim may suffer due to the defendant's carelessness or inattentiveness.

A more thorough explanation:

Criminal intent, also known as mens rea, is the mental state required to convict someone of a crime. It is one of the fundamental aspects of criminal law, along with the criminal act, or actus reus. The specific intent required to sustain a conviction varies from crime to crime and from state to state.

In some states, criminal intent is split into four categories:

  • Acting purposely: The defendant's goal was to cause the criminal conduct.
  • Acting knowingly: The defendant was practically certain that the conduct would cause a particular result.
  • Acting recklessly: The defendant consciously disregarded a substantial and unjustified risk that the criminal conduct would occur.
  • Acting negligently: The defendant was not aware of the risk criminal conduct would occur but should have been aware of the risk.

Each crime will have an associated level of criminal intent necessary to sustain the conviction. For example, standard murder typically requires a party to purposefully or knowingly cause the death of another human. Therefore, a party who only negligently causes the death of another human cannot be found guilty of murder because the criminal intent was lacking.

Penalties for the same conduct increase the higher you travel up the mental state/specific intent list. For example, manslaughter, which requires recklessly or negligently killing another human, is punished less harshly than murder. Additionally, a higher mental state can substitute for a lower one. A party who purposefully kills another human can still be found guilty of manslaughter even though their criminal intent was purposeful rather than reckless.

A minority of states instead choose to follow common law doctrines of malice. These jurisdictions determine liability by categorizing the type of malice accompanying any given criminal action between:

For example, if someone intentionally shoots and kills another person, they have acted with express malice. If someone accidentally hits and kills a pedestrian while driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol, they have acted with implied malice.

These examples illustrate how criminal intent is an essential element of criminal law. Without the proper mental state, a person cannot be convicted of a crime, even if their actions caused harm or damage.

criminal insanity | criminal justice

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
goofy-goober
15:36
I just wanna see my results man, waiting is so painful :~(
any word on scalia or any school lol
oakenrays
15:52
scalia is dead fortunately
oakenrays
15:52
law schools are coming out slowly but surely
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:03
@UnderRepresentedTryhard: Yes only for YM applicants tho
RoaldDahl
16:05
dodged the mich r wave what does this mean
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.