Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

criminal intent

Read a random definition: click-wrap license

A quick definition of criminal intent:

Criminal intent, also known as mens rea, is the mental state required to convict someone of a crime. It's one of the fundamental aspects of criminal law, along with the criminal act. The specific intent needed to prove guilt varies depending on the crime and the state. In some states, criminal intent is split into four categories: purposely, knowingly, recklessly, and negligently. Each crime has an associated level of criminal intent necessary to sustain a conviction. Penalties for the same conduct increase as the mental state/specific intent increases. Some states follow common law doctrines of malice to determine liability. Express malice is deliberate intent to bring harm to the victim, while implied malice is indifference to harm that a victim may suffer due to the defendant's carelessness or inattentiveness.

A more thorough explanation:

Criminal intent, also known as mens rea, is the mental state required to convict someone of a crime. It is one of the fundamental aspects of criminal law, along with the criminal act, or actus reus. The specific intent required to sustain a conviction varies from crime to crime and from state to state.

In some states, criminal intent is split into four categories:

  • Acting purposely: The defendant's goal was to cause the criminal conduct.
  • Acting knowingly: The defendant was practically certain that the conduct would cause a particular result.
  • Acting recklessly: The defendant consciously disregarded a substantial and unjustified risk that the criminal conduct would occur.
  • Acting negligently: The defendant was not aware of the risk criminal conduct would occur but should have been aware of the risk.

Each crime will have an associated level of criminal intent necessary to sustain the conviction. For example, standard murder typically requires a party to purposefully or knowingly cause the death of another human. Therefore, a party who only negligently causes the death of another human cannot be found guilty of murder because the criminal intent was lacking.

Penalties for the same conduct increase the higher you travel up the mental state/specific intent list. For example, manslaughter, which requires recklessly or negligently killing another human, is punished less harshly than murder. Additionally, a higher mental state can substitute for a lower one. A party who purposefully kills another human can still be found guilty of manslaughter even though their criminal intent was purposeful rather than reckless.

A minority of states instead choose to follow common law doctrines of malice. These jurisdictions determine liability by categorizing the type of malice accompanying any given criminal action between:

For example, if someone intentionally shoots and kills another person, they have acted with express malice. If someone accidentally hits and kills a pedestrian while driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol, they have acted with implied malice.

These examples illustrate how criminal intent is an essential element of criminal law. Without the proper mental state, a person cannot be convicted of a crime, even if their actions caused harm or damage.

criminal insanity | criminal justice

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.