Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

custodial interference

Read a random definition: custodia terrae et haeredis

A quick definition of custodial interference:

Definition: Custodial interference is when a parent doesn't follow the rules set by the court about who gets to take care of a child. This can be as serious as taking a child away from the parent who is supposed to have them, or as small as calling the child too much. Sometimes, custodial interference is against the law, and taking a child or keeping them away from their parent can be considered kidnapping. However, if there is an emergency or if the parent thinks the child is in danger, they might not get in trouble for breaking the rules.

A more thorough explanation:

Custodial interference

Custodial interference is when a parent violates a court order regarding custody of their child. This can be as serious as taking the child away from the custodial parent or as minor as contacting the child more than allowed. Custodial interference is considered a crime in many cases, and taking a child or keeping them longer than allowed from the custodial parent can be considered kidnapping. However, if the action is taken to protect the child from harm or danger, such as during a natural disaster or to prevent violence, the parent may not be charged with a crime.

  • A mother takes her child on a vacation without the permission of the father who has sole custody of the child.
  • A father refuses to return the child to the mother after their scheduled visitation time has ended.

These examples illustrate custodial interference because in both cases, a parent is violating a court order regarding custody of the child. The mother in the first example is taking the child away from the sole custodian without permission, while the father in the second example is keeping the child longer than allowed. Both actions are considered custodial interference and can result in legal consequences.

curtilage | custodial interrogation

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
goofy-goober
15:36
I just wanna see my results man, waiting is so painful :~(
any word on scalia or any school lol
oakenrays
15:52
scalia is dead fortunately
oakenrays
15:52
law schools are coming out slowly but surely
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:03
@UnderRepresentedTryhard: Yes only for YM applicants tho
RoaldDahl
16:05
dodged the mich r wave what does this mean
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.