Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

dangerous lunatic

Read a random definition: yardstick theory

A quick definition of dangerous lunatic:

Term: DANGEROUS LUNATIC

Definition: A dangerous lunatic is someone who is mentally ill and poses a threat to themselves or others. They may act in unpredictable ways and can cause harm to themselves or those around them. It is important to seek help and support for individuals who may be experiencing mental health issues to prevent dangerous situations from occurring.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: A person who is mentally ill and poses a threat to themselves or others.

Example: John has been diagnosed with schizophrenia and has a history of violent outbursts. He is considered a dangerous lunatic and has been institutionalized for the safety of himself and others.

Explanation: The example illustrates the definition by showing how a person with a mental illness, in this case, schizophrenia, can become a danger to themselves or others. John's violent outbursts demonstrate the potential harm that a dangerous lunatic can cause, and the need for institutionalization to protect both the individual and society.

dangerous instrumentality | dangerous occupation

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
U kno even tho their circuit numbers don't compare to other schools, those #s are better than expected tbh
40-50 fed clerks is pretty cool
texaslawhopefully
20:29
That’s fair. Chicago though: https://www.law.uchicago.edu/clerkships
That's sweet. Again tho, unclear with Fedsoc tho. But u sounded like ur willing to go Fedsoc so ur set
lilypadfrog
20:31
yeah Tex is a fedsoc guy iirc
lilypadfrog
20:31
Is it really like no clerkship benefit at Chicago if you’re not conservative?
lilypadfrog
20:31
that seems crazy #tome
texaslawhopefully
20:32
No, at least from the two people I know there that’s false. I think it’s just something like Chicago for conservatives is on par with S whereas for liberals it’s below HYS but above CCNP
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
YRDSL
21:31
@texaslawhopefully: it's pretty funny how even in law journal articles people can't stop confusing Penn with Penn State
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.