Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Daubert hearing

Read a random definition: clearinghouse

A quick definition of Daubert hearing:

Daubert Hearing: A special meeting held by a court to decide if the testimony of an expert witness is important and trustworthy enough to be used in a trial. This meeting happens before the trial starts and is based on rules set by the Supreme Court in a case called Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in 1993.

A more thorough explanation:

A Daubert hearing is a legal proceeding that takes place in federal district courts before a trial. The purpose of the hearing is to determine whether proposed expert testimony meets the federal requirements for relevance and reliability. This was clarified by the Supreme Court in the case of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in 1993.

For example, if a plaintiff in a personal injury case wants to introduce expert testimony from a doctor about the cause of their injuries, the defense may request a Daubert hearing to challenge the admissibility of the testimony. The judge will then evaluate the doctor's qualifications, the methodology used to reach their conclusions, and whether their testimony is relevant and reliable enough to be presented to a jury.

The purpose of a Daubert hearing is to ensure that expert testimony is based on sound scientific principles and methods, rather than speculation or personal opinion. This helps to ensure that juries are presented with reliable evidence and can make informed decisions based on the facts of the case.

datus bonis | Daubert test

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.