Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

de alto et basso

Read a random definition: descriptive trademark

A quick definition of de alto et basso:

De alto et basso is a legal term that means all disputes, no matter how big or small, are resolved through arbitration. This means that both parties agree to let a neutral third party make a decision that both parties will accept. It's like asking a teacher to settle an argument between two students. The teacher listens to both sides and makes a decision that everyone has to follow.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: De alto et basso (dee al-toh et bas-oh), n. [Law Latin “of high and low”] refers to the complete submission of all disputes, regardless of their magnitude, to arbitration.

Example: In a de alto et basso agreement, both parties agree to submit all disputes, whether big or small, to an arbitrator for resolution. For instance, if a company and its employee have a de alto et basso agreement, any disagreement between them, such as a salary dispute or a disagreement over working hours, will be resolved through arbitration.

Explanation: The term de alto et basso emphasizes that all disputes, regardless of their importance, will be resolved through arbitration. This means that both parties agree to submit to the decision of an arbitrator, who will listen to both sides and make a final decision. This type of agreement is often used in employment contracts, business partnerships, and other legal agreements to ensure that disputes are resolved quickly and fairly.

de alode parentum | de ambitu

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
YRDSL
21:31
@texaslawhopefully: it's pretty funny how even in law journal articles people can't stop confusing Penn with Penn State
texaslawhopefully
21:40
lmfao I didn't even notice that
21:42
Yeah to penn Carey students I’m sure that is a
21:42
Those are fighting words
21:46
@Dkk: one of the most deranged documents i've ever had the displeasure of reading
lilypadfrog
22:03
sometimes I go into fight or flight mode until I get all my work done
i call that locking in
Dkk
22:29
@info-man: Indeed!
22:43
No movement today
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.