Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

declarant

Read a random definition: adjudicative law

A quick definition of declarant:

A declarant is someone who says something they believe to be true. This can be in writing or spoken out loud. They might also be called an affiant if they swear that what they are saying is true. It's important to know who is and who isn't a declarant because evidence in court might not be allowed if it's hearsay, which means it's something someone else said and not something the declarant said themselves. Computers can't be declarants because they're not people.

A more thorough explanation:

A declarant is a person who makes a statement that they claim to be true. This statement can be written or spoken, but if it is written, it is usually signed. If the statement is made in the form of a sworn affidavit, the declarant is sometimes referred to as an affiant.

According to Rule 801 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, a declarant is a person who makes a statement. However, it is important to note that the declarant must be a human and not a machine or computer. This distinction is important because evidence at trial may be inadmissible as hearsay based on this distinction.

For example, in the case of Gayle v. State, a report containing text messages between the defendant and another person was not considered hearsay because the report was generated by a machine and not a statement made by a declarant.

Another example is People v. Clay, where the court found that a statement made by a witness was hearsay because the witness was not present in court to testify and be cross-examined. This illustrates the importance of having a declarant present to testify and defend their statement in court.

decision | declaration

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.