Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

defensive lockout

Read a random definition: whereupon

A quick definition of defensive lockout:

A defensive lockout is when an employer closes their business and stops employees from working because of a disagreement with the workers. This can happen when the employer thinks they will lose a lot of money or if they need to protect their legal rights. It is legal, but the U.S. Supreme Court decided that there should not be a difference between defensive and offensive lockouts. Offensive lockouts are when the employer stops workers from working to try and get an advantage in negotiations with the workers' union. This is illegal.

A more thorough explanation:

A defensive lockout is when an employer closes their business and stops employees from working because of a labor dispute. This type of lockout is done to prevent financial harm to the company or to protect a legal right.

For example, if a union threatens to strike and the employer believes that the strike will cause irreparable financial harm to the company, the employer may initiate a defensive lockout to prevent the strike from happening.

It is important to note that defensive lockouts were legal, but the U.S. Supreme Court abolished the distinction between defensive and offensive lockouts in favor of a balancing test. Offensive lockouts, which are called by management to assert economic pressure on workers and gain a bargaining advantage over a union, were illegal before this decision.

Loosely, an employee's refusal to work because the employer unreasonably refuses to abide by an expired employment contract while a new one is being negotiated can also be considered a defensive lockout.

For example, if an employee's contract has expired and the employer refuses to negotiate a new one, the employee may refuse to work until a new contract is agreed upon. This is considered a defensive lockout because the employee is protecting their legal right to a fair contract.

defensive-force justification | defensive publication

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.