Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

balancing test

Read a random definition: concurrent writ

A quick definition of balancing test:

A balancing test is when a court tries to figure out which thing is more important when two things are in conflict. For example, a court might have to decide if a prisoner's right to freedom is more important than the government's need to keep people safe. They have to weigh the pros and cons of each side to make a decision. This is different from a bright-line rule, which is a clear and specific rule that must be followed without any exceptions.

A more thorough explanation:

Balancing test

A balancing test is a subjective evaluation used by a court to weigh competing interests. This means that a court will consider the interests of different parties involved in a case and determine which interest should be given more weight. For example, a court may weigh an inmate's liberty interest against the government's interest in public safety to decide which interest is more important.

One example of a balancing test is the test used by the Supreme Court in the case of Wilkinson v. Austin (2005). In this case, the court had to balance the interest of an inmate's liberty against the government's interest in maintaining public safety. The court ultimately decided that the government's interest in public safety outweighed the inmate's liberty interest.

Another example of a balancing test is the test used by courts to determine whether a person's right to free speech outweighs another person's right to privacy. In this case, the court would weigh the interests of the person speaking against the interests of the person whose privacy is being invaded.

A balancing test is different from a bright-line rule. A bright-line rule is a clear and objective rule that can be applied in all cases. For example, a bright-line rule might be that all people under the age of 18 are not allowed to vote. This rule is clear and objective, and it can be applied in all cases without any subjective evaluation.

balance sheet | balloon mortgage

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.