Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

defensive publication

Read a random definition: evidentia

A quick definition of defensive publication:

A defensive publication is a way to protect an invention or idea by publicly disclosing it. This means that the information is made available to the public, preventing others from patenting or claiming ownership of the same idea. It is a defensive strategy used to prevent others from profiting from an invention or idea that you have created.

A more thorough explanation:

A defensive publication is a type of intellectual property strategy where an inventor or company publishes their invention or innovation in a public forum to prevent others from patenting the same idea. This is done to protect the inventor's rights and prevent others from claiming ownership of the idea.

For example, if a company develops a new software program, they may choose to publish the details of the program in a technical journal or online forum. By doing so, they are making the information available to the public and preventing others from patenting the same idea. This can be a cost-effective way to protect their intellectual property without having to go through the lengthy and expensive process of obtaining a patent.

Another example of a defensive publication is when an inventor publishes their idea in a patent application but chooses not to pursue the patent. By doing so, they are making the information available to the public and preventing others from patenting the same idea.

In summary, a defensive publication is a strategy used to protect intellectual property by making the details of an invention or innovation publicly available to prevent others from patenting the same idea.

defensive lockout | defensive treaty

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.