Simple English definitions for legal terms
Read a random definition: Coase Theorem
Diversity jurisdiction is a way for a federal court to hear a case. It happens when the amount of money involved is more than $75,000 and the people involved are from different states. If a company is involved, it is considered a citizen of the state where it was created and where it does most of its business. In class action lawsuits, only one person needs to be from a different state than the defendant. Even if diversity jurisdiction is possible, the case can still be heard in state court. If a defendant wants to move the case to federal court, they can do so. The federal court must follow the laws of the state where it is located. This is called the Erie doctrine.
Diversity jurisdiction is a way for a federal court to have the power to hear a case. It is one of two ways, the other being federal question jurisdiction.
For a federal court to have diversity jurisdiction, two things must be true:
For example, if someone from California sues someone from New York for $100,000, a federal court could hear the case because there is diversity jurisdiction.
However, if someone from California sues someone else from California for $100,000, a federal court could not hear the case because there is no diversity jurisdiction.
It's important to note that if diversity jurisdiction exists, the defendant can choose to move the case from state court to federal court.
Also, if there is a class action lawsuit, the rules for diversity jurisdiction are a little different. In that case, only one person needs to be from a different state than the defendant for the federal court to have jurisdiction.
Finally, if a federal court has diversity jurisdiction, it must follow the laws of the state where the case is being heard.
For example, if a federal court in California hears a case because of diversity jurisdiction, it must follow California law.